Grieving in the 21st Century: Social Media's Role in Facilitating Supportive Exchanges Following Community-Level Traumatic Events

K. Glasgow, Jessica Vitak, Y. Tausczik, Clayton Fink
{"title":"Grieving in the 21st Century: Social Media's Role in Facilitating Supportive Exchanges Following Community-Level Traumatic Events","authors":"K. Glasgow, Jessica Vitak, Y. Tausczik, Clayton Fink","doi":"10.1145/2930971.2930975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the aftermath of a traumatic mass casualty event, a community's resources are strained, while its needs for tangible, emotional, and informational support are elevated. Social media may serve to bridge the distance between the locally affected community and those outside who are willing to offer support. This exploratory study uses Twitter as a lens for examining gratitude for support in the aftermath of disaster. We examine how social media may provide new opportunities for support to be exchanged and networks to be formed in the aftermath of a traumatic event. By analyzing tweets originating from Newtown, Connecticut after the school shooting, we identify and describe six categories of support exchanged through Twitter, including two categories (symbolic and role-based) that have not been extensively discussed in the social support literature -- but are valued by the community. Each type of support network shows distinct structural characteristics and temporal variance.","PeriodicalId":227482,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 7th 2016 International Conference on Social Media & Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 7th 2016 International Conference on Social Media & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2930971.2930975","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

In the aftermath of a traumatic mass casualty event, a community's resources are strained, while its needs for tangible, emotional, and informational support are elevated. Social media may serve to bridge the distance between the locally affected community and those outside who are willing to offer support. This exploratory study uses Twitter as a lens for examining gratitude for support in the aftermath of disaster. We examine how social media may provide new opportunities for support to be exchanged and networks to be formed in the aftermath of a traumatic event. By analyzing tweets originating from Newtown, Connecticut after the school shooting, we identify and describe six categories of support exchanged through Twitter, including two categories (symbolic and role-based) that have not been extensively discussed in the social support literature -- but are valued by the community. Each type of support network shows distinct structural characteristics and temporal variance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
21世纪的悲伤:社交媒体在促进社区创伤事件后支持性交流中的作用
在创伤性大规模伤亡事件发生后,社区的资源紧张,而对有形、情感和信息支持的需求却增加了。社交媒体可能有助于弥合当地受灾社区与愿意提供支持的外界人士之间的距离。这项探索性研究使用推特作为一个镜头来检查灾难发生后对支持的感激之情。我们研究了社交媒体如何在创伤事件发生后为交换支持和形成网络提供新的机会。通过分析校园枪击事件后来自康涅狄格州纽敦的推文,我们确定并描述了通过推特交换的六类支持,其中包括两类(象征性和基于角色的),这两类支持在社会支持文献中没有得到广泛讨论,但却受到社区的重视。每种类型的支持网络都表现出不同的结构特征和时间方差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Twitter Adoption in U.S. Legislatures: A Fifty-State Study The Roles of Sensation Seeking and Gratifications Sought in Social Networking Apps Use and Attendant Sexual Behaviors How Twitter reveals Cities within Cities The Method to the Madness: The 2012 United States Presidential Election Twitter Corpus Introduction to the 2016 International Conference on Social Media and Society
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1