PHONEME RECOGNITION AND CONFUSIONS IN PATIENTS WITH SENSORINEURAL HEARING LOSS

Z. Jachova, L. Ristovska, Jasmina Kovačević, Nerxhivane Krasniqi
{"title":"PHONEME RECOGNITION AND CONFUSIONS IN PATIENTS WITH SENSORINEURAL HEARING LOSS","authors":"Z. Jachova, L. Ristovska, Jasmina Kovačević, Nerxhivane Krasniqi","doi":"10.21554/hrr.042312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hearing impaired listeners show different phoneme confusions during speech recognition testing. The aim of the study was to analyze phoneme recognition in patients with sensorineural hearing loss during word recognition testing with monosyllable words, as well as, to compare consonant confusions in different vowel context. Recognition of 18 initial and final consonants was analyzed in a total of 698 presentations of the words. There were 1154 (82.7%) correct recognitions and 100 consonant confusions (7.2%). The patients did not response at a total of 71 presentations of the words which means that consonants in 142 cases (10.2%) were not recognized, nor confused. There are no consonant confusion patterns during suprathreshold testing with real words. In cases of phoneme confusions, listeners replace the stimulus word with another word from the lexical neighborhood. In terms of the vowel context, the consonants are the most easily identified in the context of the vowel /a/.","PeriodicalId":431886,"journal":{"name":"Journal Human Research in Rehabilitation","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal Human Research in Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21554/hrr.042312","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hearing impaired listeners show different phoneme confusions during speech recognition testing. The aim of the study was to analyze phoneme recognition in patients with sensorineural hearing loss during word recognition testing with monosyllable words, as well as, to compare consonant confusions in different vowel context. Recognition of 18 initial and final consonants was analyzed in a total of 698 presentations of the words. There were 1154 (82.7%) correct recognitions and 100 consonant confusions (7.2%). The patients did not response at a total of 71 presentations of the words which means that consonants in 142 cases (10.2%) were not recognized, nor confused. There are no consonant confusion patterns during suprathreshold testing with real words. In cases of phoneme confusions, listeners replace the stimulus word with another word from the lexical neighborhood. In terms of the vowel context, the consonants are the most easily identified in the context of the vowel /a/.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
感音神经性听力损失患者的音素识别与混淆
听力障碍听众在语音识别测试中表现出不同的音素混淆。本研究的目的是分析感音神经性听力损失患者在单音节单词识别测试中的音素识别,并比较不同元音语境下的辅音混淆。在总共698个单词中分析了18个声母和韵母的识别。正确识别1154例(82.7%),混淆辅音100例(7.2%)。患者对71个单词没有反应,这意味着142例(10.2%)的辅音不被识别或混淆。在真实单词的超阈测试中没有辅音混淆模式。在音素混淆的情况下,听者用邻近词汇中的另一个单词替换刺激词。在元音上下文中,辅音在元音/a/上下文中是最容易识别的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Teachers’ Indıvıdual Cultural Values and the Relatıonshıp Between Psychologıcal Resılıence and Perceptıons of Alıenatıon Why do Employees Prefer to Keep Silent? Is Fear of Managers and Management's Approach Causing Employees' Silence? Evaluation and Self-Evaluation of Teachers During the Educational Process The Judicial Institutions Response to Human Trafficking: A Case Study From Southeast Europe New Paradigm of Education: A Review on Analyzing the Effectiveness of Vocabulary Learning Through Animation Movies in English Language Classrooms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1