Making Art / Discovering Science

S. Shapin
{"title":"Making Art / Discovering Science","authors":"S. Shapin","doi":"10.1086/699899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"H ere is one way that, in ordinary speech, we mark the distinction between science and art. We say that scientists discover things—the relationship between the volume and pressure of air was discovered by Boyle; nuclear fission was discovered by Hahn, Strassmann, and Meitner; the structure of DNA was discovered by Watson and Crick. We say, however, that artists invent, compose, construct, or make things—Mozart composed Così fan tutte; Botticelli made La Primavera; Philip Roth invented Nathan Zuckerman. In ordinary speech, all genuine art is made up and no genuine science is made up. Again, in ordinary speech, the difference between these categories is fundamental: it’s an important way we have to distinguish science and art in the stream of culture, to assign them to different institutions, to give us confidence in our distinctions, to hold them to different standards, and to assign them to different schemes of value. The categories also mark out different kinds of relationship between the named responsible people, and what it is they are said to be responsible for. And it picks out different existential standings for the","PeriodicalId":187662,"journal":{"name":"KNOW: A Journal on the Formation of Knowledge","volume":"107 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"KNOW: A Journal on the Formation of Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/699899","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

H ere is one way that, in ordinary speech, we mark the distinction between science and art. We say that scientists discover things—the relationship between the volume and pressure of air was discovered by Boyle; nuclear fission was discovered by Hahn, Strassmann, and Meitner; the structure of DNA was discovered by Watson and Crick. We say, however, that artists invent, compose, construct, or make things—Mozart composed Così fan tutte; Botticelli made La Primavera; Philip Roth invented Nathan Zuckerman. In ordinary speech, all genuine art is made up and no genuine science is made up. Again, in ordinary speech, the difference between these categories is fundamental: it’s an important way we have to distinguish science and art in the stream of culture, to assign them to different institutions, to give us confidence in our distinctions, to hold them to different standards, and to assign them to different schemes of value. The categories also mark out different kinds of relationship between the named responsible people, and what it is they are said to be responsible for. And it picks out different existential standings for the
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创造艺术/发现科学
在日常用语中,我们用一种方式来区分科学和艺术。我们说科学家发现了事物——波义耳发现了空气的体积和压力之间的关系;核裂变是由哈恩、斯特拉斯曼和迈特纳发现的;DNA的结构是沃森和克里克发现的。然而,我们说艺术家发明、作曲、构造或制造东西——莫扎特作曲Così fantutte;波提切利创作了《春光》;菲利普·罗斯发明了内森·祖克曼。在日常讲话中,一切真正的艺术都是编造出来的,而没有真正的科学是编造出来的。再一次,在日常讲话中,这些范畴之间的区别是根本的:这是我们在文化流中区分科学和艺术的重要方式,将它们分配给不同的机构,让我们对我们的区别有信心,用不同的标准来衡量它们,并将它们分配给不同的价值体系。这些分类还标出了被点名的责任人之间的不同类型的关系,以及他们据称对什么负责。它选择了不同的存在立场
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Transcreation and Postcolonial Knowledge Chomsky versus Foucault, and the Problem of Knowledge in Translation When Dragons Show Themselves: Research, Constructing Knowledge, and the Practice of Translation A Critique of Provincial Reason: Situated Cosmopolitanisms and the Infrastructures of Theoretical Translation Translation and the Archive
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1