Who's Spoofing Whom?

P. Peterson
{"title":"Who's Spoofing Whom?","authors":"P. Peterson","doi":"10.22004/AG.ECON.229497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many opinions have been expressed by market participants in the weeks since a Chicago jury found Michael Coscia guilty of “spoofing” on November 3. This was the first criminal case on spoofing, and the first to be tried under the expanded definition of disruptive futures market trading practices in the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Customer Protection Act. Dodd-Frank defines spoofing as “bidding or offering with the intent to cancel the bid or offer before execution.” Also see in the farmdoc daily article on May 6, 2015 for a detailed illustration of how spoofing works.","PeriodicalId":329270,"journal":{"name":"farmdoc daily","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"farmdoc daily","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22004/AG.ECON.229497","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Many opinions have been expressed by market participants in the weeks since a Chicago jury found Michael Coscia guilty of “spoofing” on November 3. This was the first criminal case on spoofing, and the first to be tried under the expanded definition of disruptive futures market trading practices in the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Customer Protection Act. Dodd-Frank defines spoofing as “bidding or offering with the intent to cancel the bid or offer before execution.” Also see in the farmdoc daily article on May 6, 2015 for a detailed illustration of how spoofing works.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
谁在欺骗谁?
自11月3日芝加哥陪审团裁定迈克尔•科西亚(Michael Coscia)犯有“欺骗”罪以来,几周内市场参与者表达了多种观点。这是第一起关于欺诈的刑事案件,也是第一起根据《多德-弗兰克华尔街改革与客户保护法案》(Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Customer Protection Act)扩大的破坏性期货市场交易行为定义进行审判的案件。多德-弗兰克法案将欺骗定义为“意图在执行之前取消投标或要约的投标或要约”。也可以在2015年5月6日的farmdoc每日文章中看到关于如何欺骗工作的详细说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Will Pork Industry Have a Better 2019 Swine Feed Cost Projections for 2019 2018 Farm Bill Updated: Conference Negotiations Begin Initial Review of the House 2018 Farm Bill Reviewing Farm Bill History: the Agricultural Act of 1954
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1