{"title":"STATE PROTECTION UPON ADOLESCENT VICTIM OF INCEST RAPE THROUGH GENDER LENS","authors":"E. Rahmi, Elly Sudarti","doi":"10.14710/DILREV.4.1.2019.89-104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The state obligations to fulfill and protect the rights of adolescent victim of incest rape post-abortion and other rights have not been exercised during the legal process of investigation until court verdict as it is indicated that the adolescent victim is unfairly detained without due process for illegally practicing abortion. This occasion indicates that the law is being unfair towards the adolescent victim without considering the precondition which inevitably forces the abortion. This article scrutinizes such case of Muara Bulian county in which the local court’s verdict No. 5/Pid.Sus.Anak/2018/PN.Mbn did not accommodate the substantive justice which take stand of the rights of adolescent victim of incest rape. The verdict indicates that such court verdict does not express gender sensitivity to the right of adolescent female victim of incest rape to which the state is obliged to fulfil and protect.","PeriodicalId":432511,"journal":{"name":"Diponegoro Law Review","volume":"134 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diponegoro Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14710/DILREV.4.1.2019.89-104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
The state obligations to fulfill and protect the rights of adolescent victim of incest rape post-abortion and other rights have not been exercised during the legal process of investigation until court verdict as it is indicated that the adolescent victim is unfairly detained without due process for illegally practicing abortion. This occasion indicates that the law is being unfair towards the adolescent victim without considering the precondition which inevitably forces the abortion. This article scrutinizes such case of Muara Bulian county in which the local court’s verdict No. 5/Pid.Sus.Anak/2018/PN.Mbn did not accommodate the substantive justice which take stand of the rights of adolescent victim of incest rape. The verdict indicates that such court verdict does not express gender sensitivity to the right of adolescent female victim of incest rape to which the state is obliged to fulfil and protect.
在法院判决之前的法律调查过程中,国家履行和保护乱伦强奸青少年受害者堕胎后的权利和其他权利的义务没有得到行使,因为有证据表明,青少年受害者因非法堕胎而未经正当程序被不公正地拘留。这一事件表明,法律对青少年受害者不公平,没有考虑到不可避免地迫使堕胎的先决条件。本文详细考察了Muara Bulian县当地法院第5号判决书/ pid . su . anak /2018/PN。Mbn没有顾及对乱伦强奸青少年受害者的权利采取立场的实质司法。该判决表明,这种法院判决没有对国家有义务履行和保护的乱伦强奸少女受害者的权利表达性别敏感性。