Research Data: Management and Opening. Polish and European Perspectives

Zuzanna Wiorogórska
{"title":"Research Data: Management and Opening. Polish and European Perspectives","authors":"Zuzanna Wiorogórska","doi":"10.36702/zin.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose/Thesis: This paper attempts to present the trends in management and opening of research data in Poland and the European Union, based on the analysis of the recently published Polish and European acts and documents as well as of other international initiatives which might influence scholarly publishing and scholarly communication.Approach/Methods: An in-depth review of the latest documents was applied. Results and conclusions: I focused on highlighting the key elements of the reviewed documents and initiatives, highlighting the directions for managing and opening of research data they set and the implications they might have for Polish and European science. I also sketched the possible inconsisten­cies between the European and Polish policies related to research data and scholarly communication.Research limitations: The documents investigated for the purpose of this paper were either Polish or provided by the European Union (EU). I have not analyzed the national documents issued by the individual member states of the EU other than Poland. Hence, it is probable that some solutions on research data management and opening already taken on the level of individual member states have not been included in this paper.Practical implications: This paper may encourage a reflection on the relationship between the regulations issued at the European (EU) or at the national (in this case, Polish), and the practices and requirements of scholarly communication which often contradict those regulations.Originality/Value: This is the first analysis of the latest Polish and European documents and initiatives as related to data management and open data (open science).","PeriodicalId":176717,"journal":{"name":"Zagadnienia Informacji Naukowej - Studia Informacyjne","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zagadnienia Informacji Naukowej - Studia Informacyjne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36702/zin.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose/Thesis: This paper attempts to present the trends in management and opening of research data in Poland and the European Union, based on the analysis of the recently published Polish and European acts and documents as well as of other international initiatives which might influence scholarly publishing and scholarly communication.Approach/Methods: An in-depth review of the latest documents was applied. Results and conclusions: I focused on highlighting the key elements of the reviewed documents and initiatives, highlighting the directions for managing and opening of research data they set and the implications they might have for Polish and European science. I also sketched the possible inconsisten­cies between the European and Polish policies related to research data and scholarly communication.Research limitations: The documents investigated for the purpose of this paper were either Polish or provided by the European Union (EU). I have not analyzed the national documents issued by the individual member states of the EU other than Poland. Hence, it is probable that some solutions on research data management and opening already taken on the level of individual member states have not been included in this paper.Practical implications: This paper may encourage a reflection on the relationship between the regulations issued at the European (EU) or at the national (in this case, Polish), and the practices and requirements of scholarly communication which often contradict those regulations.Originality/Value: This is the first analysis of the latest Polish and European documents and initiatives as related to data management and open data (open science).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究数据:管理与开放。波兰和欧洲的视角
目的/论文:本文试图通过分析最近公布的波兰和欧洲的法案和文件,以及其他可能影响学术出版和学术交流的国际倡议,来呈现波兰和欧盟研究数据管理和开放的趋势。方法:深入查阅最新文献。结果和结论:我着重强调了审查文件和倡议的关键要素,强调了管理和开放研究数据的方向,以及它们可能对波兰和欧洲科学产生的影响。我还概述了欧洲和波兰在研究数据和学术交流方面的政策之间可能存在的不一致。研究局限:本文调查的文件要么是波兰的,要么是欧盟提供的。我没有分析除波兰以外的欧盟成员国各自发布的国家文件。因此,在个别成员国层面上已经采取的一些研究数据管理和开放的解决方案很可能没有包括在本文中。实际意义:本文可能会鼓励对欧洲(EU)或国家(在本例中为波兰)发布的法规与经常与这些法规相矛盾的学术交流的实践和要求之间的关系进行反思。原创性/价值:这是对最新波兰和欧洲与数据管理和开放数据(开放科学)相关的文件和倡议的首次分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Społeczne znaczenie informacji o nauce i komunikacji medialnej w działalności towarzystw naukowych How do early career researchers perceive success in their fields? – report on interviews with humanists, theologians and scientists-artists in Poland Źródła informacji o zachowaniach widzów telewizyjnych z wykorzystaniem pomiaru RPD. Sprawozdanie z VI Międzynarodowej Konferencji Naukowej „Nauka o informacji (informacja naukowa) w okresie zmian Informacja na temat nagród filmowych versus zainteresowania widzów
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1