KNjIŽEVNE SLOBODE I DRUŠTVENE GRANICE U SRBIJI

Zoran Avramović
{"title":"KNjIŽEVNE SLOBODE I DRUŠTVENE GRANICE U SRBIJI","authors":"Zoran Avramović","doi":"10.46793/zip21.135a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper discusses the absolute freedom of literary (artistic) creation. The difference between general and literary freedom is emphasized. In the second part, different boundaries of literary creation in anti-democratic and democratic systems are pointed out. In anti-democratic systems, it is public authority that sets boundaries of artistic freedom, and in democratic systems it is the readers, critics, market, cultural institutions. It is concluded that criticism, condemnation (rejection by individuals and some institutions) of a literary content in democracy does not mean endangering the freedom of literary creation due to the fact that there are many publishers and cultural institutions. The claim of absolute freedom of creativity is also disputed.","PeriodicalId":441367,"journal":{"name":"IDENTITETSKE promene: srpski jezik i književnost u doba tranzicije","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IDENTITETSKE promene: srpski jezik i književnost u doba tranzicije","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46793/zip21.135a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper discusses the absolute freedom of literary (artistic) creation. The difference between general and literary freedom is emphasized. In the second part, different boundaries of literary creation in anti-democratic and democratic systems are pointed out. In anti-democratic systems, it is public authority that sets boundaries of artistic freedom, and in democratic systems it is the readers, critics, market, cultural institutions. It is concluded that criticism, condemnation (rejection by individuals and some institutions) of a literary content in democracy does not mean endangering the freedom of literary creation due to the fact that there are many publishers and cultural institutions. The claim of absolute freedom of creativity is also disputed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
文章论述了文学(艺术)创作的绝对自由。强调一般自由与文学自由的区别。第二部分指出了反民主体制和民主体制下文学创作的不同边界。在反民主的体制中,是公共权威为艺术自由设定界限,而在民主体制中是读者、评论家、市场、文化机构。结论是,在民主制度下,对文学内容的批评、谴责(个人和某些机构的拒绝)并不意味着危及文学创作的自由,因为出版商和文化机构众多。创造力绝对自由的主张也存在争议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
POZICIJA SRPSKOG JEZIKA U ATLASU PSEUDOMITOLOGIJE SVETISLAVA BASARE JEDAN POGLED NA REŠAVANjE PROBLEMA SRPSKOG JEZIKA U DOBA TRANZICIJE KNjIŽEVNE SLOBODE I DRUŠTVENE GRANICE U SRBIJI OGLUŠENjE O SRPSKI JEZIK SRPSKI JEZIK I NACIONALNI IDENTITET U VRIJEME GLOBALIZACIJE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1