Flourish Index and Secure Flourish Index – Development and Validation

Dorota Węziak‐Białowolska, E. McNeely, T. VanderWeele
{"title":"Flourish Index and Secure Flourish Index – Development and Validation","authors":"Dorota Węziak‐Białowolska, E. McNeely, T. VanderWeele","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3145336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this paper was to investigate psychometric properties of the newly proposed Flourish Index (FI) and Secure Flourish Index (SFI). Data were obtained from the Health and Well-Being Survey – conducted in June and July 2017, with responses from 4210 residents of North Carolina, USA. \nExploratory and confirmatory factor models were used. An exploratory approach was used to investigate item groupings. Confirmatory factor models were used to investigate the hierarchical structure of the indices, level of common variance and percent of uncontaminated correlations. The coefficient of omega hierarchical was computed to establish uni-dimensionality and reliability of the indices. Configural, metric and scalar measurement invariance were examined to provide evidence on the universality of the indices. Convergent validity and discriminant validity were assessed. \nThis study provided support that FI and SFI can be used in empirical research. Our results confirmed groupings of items into domains of flourishing as well hierarchical structure of both indices. With application of the factor analytical framework support for their uni-dimensionality was found. The analysis revealed that scores derived from FI and SFI primarily reflected a single common source, flourishing and secure flourishing, respectively, implying legitimate use of raw scores (average or sum) for their measurement. Both indices demonstrated convergent and discriminant validity. Evidence was also found that both instruments were measurement invariant.","PeriodicalId":433005,"journal":{"name":"Econometrics: Data Collection & Data Estimation Methodology eJournal","volume":"84 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Econometrics: Data Collection & Data Estimation Methodology eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3145336","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

The purpose of this paper was to investigate psychometric properties of the newly proposed Flourish Index (FI) and Secure Flourish Index (SFI). Data were obtained from the Health and Well-Being Survey – conducted in June and July 2017, with responses from 4210 residents of North Carolina, USA. Exploratory and confirmatory factor models were used. An exploratory approach was used to investigate item groupings. Confirmatory factor models were used to investigate the hierarchical structure of the indices, level of common variance and percent of uncontaminated correlations. The coefficient of omega hierarchical was computed to establish uni-dimensionality and reliability of the indices. Configural, metric and scalar measurement invariance were examined to provide evidence on the universality of the indices. Convergent validity and discriminant validity were assessed. This study provided support that FI and SFI can be used in empirical research. Our results confirmed groupings of items into domains of flourishing as well hierarchical structure of both indices. With application of the factor analytical framework support for their uni-dimensionality was found. The analysis revealed that scores derived from FI and SFI primarily reflected a single common source, flourishing and secure flourishing, respectively, implying legitimate use of raw scores (average or sum) for their measurement. Both indices demonstrated convergent and discriminant validity. Evidence was also found that both instruments were measurement invariant.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
繁荣指数和安全繁荣指数-开发和验证
本文的目的是研究新提出的繁荣指数(FI)和安全繁荣指数(SFI)的心理测量特性。数据来自2017年6月和7月进行的健康与福祉调查,得到了美国北卡罗来纳州4210名居民的回复。采用探索性和验证性因素模型。采用探索性方法调查项目分组。采用验证性因子模型考察了各指标的层次结构、共同方差水平和未污染相关性百分比。计算欧米茄等级系数,建立指标的单维性和可靠性。考察了构型不变性、度量不变性和标量不变性,为指标的普适性提供了证据。评估了收敛效度和区别效度。本研究支持FI和SFI可用于实证研究。我们的结果证实了分组项目进入繁荣领域以及两个指数的层次结构。应用因子分析框架,找到了支持其单维性的支撑。分析显示,来自FI和SFI的分数主要反映了一个共同的来源,分别是繁荣和安全繁荣,这意味着合法使用原始分数(平均或总和)进行测量。两个指标均具有收敛效度和判别效度。证据还发现,这两种仪器是测量不变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Where is Everyone? The Importance of Population Density Data: A Data Artefact Study of the Facebook Population Density Map Asynchronous Fieldwork in Cross-Country Surveys: An Application to Physical Activity Full-Information Estimation of Heterogeneous Agent Models Using Macro and Micro Data The Perils of Working with Big Data and a SMALL Framework You Can Use to Avoid Them Fighting the Learning Crisis in Developing Countries: A Randomized Experiment of Self-Learning at the Right Level
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1