Bribery and Corruption: The COSO Framework, FCPA, and U.K. Bribery Act

L. Trautman, Joanna Kimbell
{"title":"Bribery and Corruption: The COSO Framework, FCPA, and U.K. Bribery Act","authors":"L. Trautman, Joanna Kimbell","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3239193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Long-established major U.S. corporations such as McDonalds, Walmart, and Proctor and Gamble continue to derive a majority of revenues from foreign operations. In addition, a number of relatively new U.S. technology companies such as: Airbnb (2008); Facebook (2004); Snap (2011); Twitter (2006); and Uber (2009), find themselves deep into international markets, often within just a few years of creation, and certainly by the end of their first decade of operation. Increased international commerce results in the potential for greater exposure to global demands for bribery. Bribery and corruption remains a cancer eating away at the ability of nation states to provide for their citizens. Corrupt payments siphons off funds that might otherwise be used to: provide housing; feed the hungry; fight poverty, illness and disease; and educate the masses. \n \nThe Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework offers a valuable tool in the anti-fraud struggle and in FCPA and UK Bribery Act compliance. COSO’s 2017 update to the Enterprise Risk Management Integrated Framework addresses developments during recent years in integrating risk with strategy into the ERM process. Our paper proceeds in eight parts. First, we discuss the bribery and corruption problem. Second, a discussion of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) is presented. Third, we describe the U.K. Bribery Act. Fourth, we discuss the development and evolution of the COSO ERM Framework. Fifth, we apply the COSO ERM Framework as an anti-fraud strategy to assist in compliance with the FCPA and UK Bribery Act. Sixth, we discuss the application of Deferred Prosecution Agreements to the FCPA and their relevance to COSO ERM. Next, we explore the likely changes in FCPA enforcement under the Trump Administration. We believe this paper contributes to the bribery and corruption literature by exploring the potential benefits of the COSO framework.","PeriodicalId":210981,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Governance: Social Responsibility & Social Impact eJournal","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Governance: Social Responsibility & Social Impact eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3239193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Long-established major U.S. corporations such as McDonalds, Walmart, and Proctor and Gamble continue to derive a majority of revenues from foreign operations. In addition, a number of relatively new U.S. technology companies such as: Airbnb (2008); Facebook (2004); Snap (2011); Twitter (2006); and Uber (2009), find themselves deep into international markets, often within just a few years of creation, and certainly by the end of their first decade of operation. Increased international commerce results in the potential for greater exposure to global demands for bribery. Bribery and corruption remains a cancer eating away at the ability of nation states to provide for their citizens. Corrupt payments siphons off funds that might otherwise be used to: provide housing; feed the hungry; fight poverty, illness and disease; and educate the masses. The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework offers a valuable tool in the anti-fraud struggle and in FCPA and UK Bribery Act compliance. COSO’s 2017 update to the Enterprise Risk Management Integrated Framework addresses developments during recent years in integrating risk with strategy into the ERM process. Our paper proceeds in eight parts. First, we discuss the bribery and corruption problem. Second, a discussion of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) is presented. Third, we describe the U.K. Bribery Act. Fourth, we discuss the development and evolution of the COSO ERM Framework. Fifth, we apply the COSO ERM Framework as an anti-fraud strategy to assist in compliance with the FCPA and UK Bribery Act. Sixth, we discuss the application of Deferred Prosecution Agreements to the FCPA and their relevance to COSO ERM. Next, we explore the likely changes in FCPA enforcement under the Trump Administration. We believe this paper contributes to the bribery and corruption literature by exploring the potential benefits of the COSO framework.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
贿赂与腐败:COSO框架、FCPA和英国贿赂法
麦当劳、沃尔玛和宝洁等老牌美国大公司的大部分收入仍然来自海外业务。此外,一些相对较新的美国科技公司,如:Airbnb (2008);Facebook (2004);弹簧(2011);Twitter (2006);和优步(2009年),发现自己深入国际市场,通常在创建的短短几年内,当然是在第一个十年的运营结束时。国际贸易的增加可能导致更大程度地暴露于全球贿赂需求。贿赂和腐败仍然是侵蚀民族国家为其公民提供服务能力的毒瘤。腐败的支付吸走了本可用于:提供住房;喂饱饥饿的人;消除贫穷、疾病和疾病;教育大众。特雷德韦委员会(COSO)企业风险管理(ERM)框架的赞助组织委员会为反欺诈斗争以及《反海外腐败法》和《英国反贿赂法》合规提供了一个有价值的工具。COSO 2017年更新的企业风险管理综合框架解决了近年来将风险与战略整合到ERM流程中的发展。本文分为八个部分。首先,我们讨论贿赂和腐败问题。其次,对《反海外腐败法》(FCPA)进行了讨论。第三,我们描述了英国的《反贿赂法》。第四,我们讨论了COSO ERM框架的发展和演变。第五,我们将COSO ERM框架作为反欺诈策略,以协助遵守《反海外腐败法》和《英国反贿赂法》。第六,我们讨论了暂缓起诉协议在《反海外腐败法》中的适用及其与COSO ERM的相关性。接下来,我们将探讨特朗普政府在执行《反海外腐败法》方面可能发生的变化。我们认为,本文通过探索COSO框架的潜在好处,为贿赂和腐败文献做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CEO Pay Ratio Estimation under Social Pressure Strategic Leadership in Corporate Social Responsibility Does CSR Engender Trust? Evidence From Investor Reactions to Corporate Disclosures Tax Planning Knowledge Diffusion via the Labor Market Corporate Flexibility in a Time of Crisis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1