Manoeuvre is Dead?

Amos C. Fox
{"title":"Manoeuvre is Dead?","authors":"Amos C. Fox","doi":"10.1080/03071847.2022.2058601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For the better part of the 20th century, manoeuvre held primacy in Western military thinking. Yet, modern technological advances, in today’s period of limited war, have suffocated the conditions and components that manoeuvre requires to exist. As a result, it is dead. Amos C Fox argues that, instead of lamenting this, the defence and security studies communities should celebrate manoeuvre’s death as a liberating event and begin looking at alternative theories and ideas for the prosecution of war.◼","PeriodicalId":221517,"journal":{"name":"The RUSI Journal","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The RUSI Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03071847.2022.2058601","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For the better part of the 20th century, manoeuvre held primacy in Western military thinking. Yet, modern technological advances, in today’s period of limited war, have suffocated the conditions and components that manoeuvre requires to exist. As a result, it is dead. Amos C Fox argues that, instead of lamenting this, the defence and security studies communities should celebrate manoeuvre’s death as a liberating event and begin looking at alternative theories and ideas for the prosecution of war.◼
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机动已死?
在20世纪的大部分时间里,机动在西方军事思想中占据了首要地位。然而,在今天的有限战争时期,现代技术的进步扼杀了机动存在所需的条件和要素。结果,它死了。阿莫斯·C·福克斯(Amos C . Fox)认为,国防和安全研究界不应为此感到悲哀,而应将演习之死视为一件解放的事件来庆祝,并开始寻找其他的理论和观点来起诉战争
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Conservative Thinkers from All Souls College Oxford Those Must be the Guards: The Household Division in Peace and War, 1969–2023 The Rules of Security: Staying Safe in a Risky World Routledge Handbook of NATO The Weaponisation of Social Media, Crowdfunding and Drones
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1