Privacy and Security Evaluation of Mobile Payment Applications Through User-Generated Reviews

Urvashi Kishnani, Naheem Noah, Sanchari Das, Rinku Dewri
{"title":"Privacy and Security Evaluation of Mobile Payment Applications Through User-Generated Reviews","authors":"Urvashi Kishnani, Naheem Noah, Sanchari Das, Rinku Dewri","doi":"10.1145/3559613.3563196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mobile payment applications are crucial to ensure seamless day-to-day digital transactions. However, users' perceived privacy- and security-related concerns are continually rising. Users express such thoughts, complaints, and suggestions through app reviews. To this aim, we collected 1,886,352 reviews from the top 50 mobile payment applications. Furthermore, we conducted a mixed-methods in-depth evaluation of the privacy- and security-related reviews resulting in a total of 163,210 reviews. Finally, we implemented sentiment analysis and did a mixed-methods analysis of the resulting 52,749 negative reviews. Such large-scale evaluation through user reviews informs developers about the user perception of digital threats and app behaviors. Our analysis highlights that users share concerns about sharing sensitive information with the application, confidentiality of their data, and permissions requested by the apps. Users have shown significant concerns regarding the usability of these applications (48.47%), getting locked out of their accounts (38.73%), and being unable to perform successful digital transactions (31.52%). We conclude by providing actionable recommendations to address such user concerns to aid the development of secure and privacy-preserving mobile payment applications.","PeriodicalId":416548,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 21st Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 21st Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3559613.3563196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Mobile payment applications are crucial to ensure seamless day-to-day digital transactions. However, users' perceived privacy- and security-related concerns are continually rising. Users express such thoughts, complaints, and suggestions through app reviews. To this aim, we collected 1,886,352 reviews from the top 50 mobile payment applications. Furthermore, we conducted a mixed-methods in-depth evaluation of the privacy- and security-related reviews resulting in a total of 163,210 reviews. Finally, we implemented sentiment analysis and did a mixed-methods analysis of the resulting 52,749 negative reviews. Such large-scale evaluation through user reviews informs developers about the user perception of digital threats and app behaviors. Our analysis highlights that users share concerns about sharing sensitive information with the application, confidentiality of their data, and permissions requested by the apps. Users have shown significant concerns regarding the usability of these applications (48.47%), getting locked out of their accounts (38.73%), and being unable to perform successful digital transactions (31.52%). We conclude by providing actionable recommendations to address such user concerns to aid the development of secure and privacy-preserving mobile payment applications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于用户评论的移动支付应用隐私与安全评估
移动支付应用程序对于确保无缝的日常数字交易至关重要。然而,用户对隐私和安全的担忧正在不断上升。用户通过应用评论来表达这些想法、抱怨和建议。为此,我们从排名前50的移动支付应用中收集了1,886352条评论。此外,我们对隐私和安全相关的评论进行了混合方法的深入评估,总共有163,210条评论。最后,我们执行了情感分析,并对52,749条负面评论进行了混合方法分析。这种通过用户评论进行的大规模评估可以让开发者了解用户对数字威胁和应用行为的看法。我们的分析强调,用户对与应用程序共享敏感信息、数据的保密性以及应用程序请求的权限有共同的担忧。用户对这些应用程序的可用性(48.47%)、账户被锁定(38.73%)以及无法成功执行数字交易(31.52%)表现出极大的担忧。最后,我们提供了可行的建议,以解决这些用户关注的问题,以帮助开发安全和保护隐私的移动支付应用程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Darwin's Theory of Censorship: Analysing the Evolution of Censored Topics with Dynamic Topic Models PRSONA Tracking the Evolution of Cookie-based Tracking on Facebook Fingerprinting and Personal Information Leakage from Touchscreen Interactions Privacy and Security Evaluation of Mobile Payment Applications Through User-Generated Reviews
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1