Comparing French liaison acquisition in L1 children and L2 adults

Mylène Harnois-Delpiano, Cristelle Cavalla, Jean-Pierre Chevrot
{"title":"Comparing French liaison acquisition in L1 children and L2 adults","authors":"Mylène Harnois-Delpiano, Cristelle Cavalla, Jean-Pierre Chevrot","doi":"10.1075/lia.17021.har","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In the study of liaison acquisition, a key line of inquiry has focused on potential differences and similarities\n between L1 and L2 French speakers. However, such a comparison encounters a number of difficulties such as matching learners in\n terms of language exposure, age, and learning abilities. This study addresses these issues based on the analysis of French liaison\n in a series of experimental tasks performed by L1 children aged two to six, and by adult Korean learners of French as a foreign\n language. Results show that, for both groups, acquisition of categorical liaison precedes acquisition of variable\n liaison. However, when L1 and L2 learners are matched individually based on the results of a production task, they differ in a\n judgment task involving the perception of liaison. More specifically, the ability to judge the correctness of liaison precedes the\n ability to produce it in L2 learners, but not in L1 children. The findings provide a strong indication that L2 learners follow a\n specific process when acquiring liaison.","PeriodicalId":398878,"journal":{"name":"French liaison in second language acquisition / La liaison en français langue étrangère","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"French liaison in second language acquisition / La liaison en français langue étrangère","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.17021.har","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

In the study of liaison acquisition, a key line of inquiry has focused on potential differences and similarities between L1 and L2 French speakers. However, such a comparison encounters a number of difficulties such as matching learners in terms of language exposure, age, and learning abilities. This study addresses these issues based on the analysis of French liaison in a series of experimental tasks performed by L1 children aged two to six, and by adult Korean learners of French as a foreign language. Results show that, for both groups, acquisition of categorical liaison precedes acquisition of variable liaison. However, when L1 and L2 learners are matched individually based on the results of a production task, they differ in a judgment task involving the perception of liaison. More specifically, the ability to judge the correctness of liaison precedes the ability to produce it in L2 learners, but not in L1 children. The findings provide a strong indication that L2 learners follow a specific process when acquiring liaison.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较母语儿童和母语成人法语联络习得
在联系习得的研究中,一条关键的探究线集中在母语和第二语言法语使用者之间潜在的差异和相似之处。然而,这种比较会遇到一些困难,比如在语言接触、年龄和学习能力方面匹配学习者。本研究通过分析两至六岁的母语儿童和以法语为外语的成年韩国学习者在一系列实验任务中的法语联系来解决这些问题。结果表明,两组的分类联系习得都先于变量联系习得。然而,当根据生产任务的结果分别匹配第一语言学习者和第二语言学习者时,他们在涉及联络感知的判断任务中有所不同。更具体地说,在二语学习者中,判断联络正确性的能力先于产生联络的能力,而在母语儿童中则不然。研究结果有力地表明,第二语言学习者在习得联络时遵循一个特定的过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparing French liaison acquisition in L1 children and L2 adults The emergence of speech segmentation in adult L2 learners of French The production of preverbal liaison in Swedish learners of L2 French The development of obligatory liaison in early L2 learners of French Learning to read liaison in French as a Foreign Language
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1