Building multiple-viewpoint assurance cases using assumption/guarantee contracts

Irfan Šljivo, B. Gallina
{"title":"Building multiple-viewpoint assurance cases using assumption/guarantee contracts","authors":"Irfan Šljivo, B. Gallina","doi":"10.1145/2993412.3007555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Assurance cases in form of structured arguments are often required by standards to show that a system is acceptable for its intended purpose with respect to a particular assurance viewpoint such as safety or security. The goal of such a case is to present an argument that connects the requirements of a particular viewpoint with the supporting evidence. Building a set of assurance cases for the different viewpoints can be time-consuming and costly. Means are needed to automate and reuse the assurance case artefacts between the assurance cases for the different viewpoints. In this paper we present how assumption/guarantee contracts can be used to facilitate reuse of assurance case artefacts by building multiple-viewpoint assurance cases from the contracts. More specifically, we build upon the previous work on argument-fragment generation from such contracts to allow for generating viewpoint specific argument-fragments. We illustrate the approach on a motivating case.","PeriodicalId":409631,"journal":{"name":"Proccedings of the 10th European Conference on Software Architecture Workshops","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proccedings of the 10th European Conference on Software Architecture Workshops","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2993412.3007555","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Assurance cases in form of structured arguments are often required by standards to show that a system is acceptable for its intended purpose with respect to a particular assurance viewpoint such as safety or security. The goal of such a case is to present an argument that connects the requirements of a particular viewpoint with the supporting evidence. Building a set of assurance cases for the different viewpoints can be time-consuming and costly. Means are needed to automate and reuse the assurance case artefacts between the assurance cases for the different viewpoints. In this paper we present how assumption/guarantee contracts can be used to facilitate reuse of assurance case artefacts by building multiple-viewpoint assurance cases from the contracts. More specifically, we build upon the previous work on argument-fragment generation from such contracts to allow for generating viewpoint specific argument-fragments. We illustrate the approach on a motivating case.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用假设/担保合同构建多视点保证案例
标准通常需要结构化论证形式的保证案例,以表明系统对于特定保证观点(如安全或保安)的预期目的是可接受的。这种情况的目标是提出一个论点,将特定观点的要求与支持证据联系起来。为不同的视点构建一组保证用例既耗时又昂贵。需要在不同视点的保证用例之间自动化和重用保证用例构件的方法。在本文中,我们展示了假设/保证契约如何通过从契约中构建多视点保证案例来促进保证案例工件的重用。更具体地说,我们建立在先前关于从此类契约生成参数片段的工作的基础上,以允许生成特定于视点的参数片段。我们用一个激励案例来说明这种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Model-based development of sustainable cyber-physical systems including requirement formalization using the openModelica model-based development toolkit Towards an evaluation method for software ecosystem practices Aligning architectures for sustainability Towards the essentials of architecture documentation for avoiding architecture erosion Supporting quality-driven architectural design decisions in software ecosystems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1