Analysis of quality network using MPLS and non MPLS

B. Soewito, F. Gunawan, S. Afdhal, A. Antonyova
{"title":"Analysis of quality network using MPLS and non MPLS","authors":"B. Soewito, F. Gunawan, S. Afdhal, A. Antonyova","doi":"10.1109/ISITIA.2017.8124044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of the Internet has become very important in our daily life. Therefore, the quality of the network is becomes very important. There are several protocol and technology in the Internet network. In this paper we analyzed Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) compared to Non MPLS. We compared the throughput, packet loss, and Jitter. We used the tools such as Iperf, Wireshark and routing table to do simulation and take the data. The result show the MPLS technology has better result compared to Non MPLS. The throughput is 82.5 Mbit/sec compared to 70 Mbit/sec. The packet loss is 0.4% compared to 1%. Both of technology had the jitter less than 50 ms. We concluded that quality network using MPLS can be increase compared to Non MPLS.","PeriodicalId":308504,"journal":{"name":"2017 International Seminar on Intelligent Technology and Its Applications (ISITIA)","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 International Seminar on Intelligent Technology and Its Applications (ISITIA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISITIA.2017.8124044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The use of the Internet has become very important in our daily life. Therefore, the quality of the network is becomes very important. There are several protocol and technology in the Internet network. In this paper we analyzed Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) compared to Non MPLS. We compared the throughput, packet loss, and Jitter. We used the tools such as Iperf, Wireshark and routing table to do simulation and take the data. The result show the MPLS technology has better result compared to Non MPLS. The throughput is 82.5 Mbit/sec compared to 70 Mbit/sec. The packet loss is 0.4% compared to 1%. Both of technology had the jitter less than 50 ms. We concluded that quality network using MPLS can be increase compared to Non MPLS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用MPLS和非MPLS的质量网络分析
互联网的使用在我们的日常生活中变得非常重要。因此,网络的质量就变得非常重要。Internet网络中有多种协议和技术。本文对多协议标签交换(MPLS)与非MPLS进行了比较分析。我们比较了吞吐量、数据包丢失和抖动。我们使用Iperf、Wireshark、路由表等工具进行仿真并获取数据。结果表明,与非MPLS技术相比,MPLS技术具有更好的性能。吞吐量是82.5 Mbit/sec,而不是70 Mbit/sec。丢包率从1%降低到0.4%。两种技术的抖动都小于50毫秒。结果表明,与非MPLS相比,使用MPLS可以提高网络质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Design and analysis of DC/AC inverter using passive LCL filter with damping circuit configuration Ink bleed-through binarization of Javanese handwritten ancient document using local adaptive threshold based on local class width Design of electronic speed controller for BLDC motor based on single ended primary inductance converter (SEPIC) An optimal power flow control method for PV systems with single phase Shimizu inverter Expert system for diagnosis pests and diseases of the rice plant using forward chaining and certainty factor method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1