Comparison of Student's Learning Success Between Problem Solving Methods and Recitations in Learning Public Relations and Protocollability

U. Wulandari, Efni Cerya
{"title":"Comparison of Student's Learning Success Between Problem Solving Methods and Recitations in Learning Public Relations and Protocollability","authors":"U. Wulandari, Efni Cerya","doi":"10.15294/eeaj.v11i3.61664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to determine the difference in the level of student learning success using the Problem-Solving method and the Recitation method in learning Automation of Public Relations and Protocol Governance at SMK Negeri 3 Padang using Quasi-Experimental type with Noneequivalent Control Group Design. The population of this study was 61 students with a sample of all parts of the population. The sampling technique was Total Sampling. The research instrument was in the form of test questions. The data analysis technique used was descriptive analysis, Prerequisite Analysis Test, namely Normality Test and Homogeneity Test, N-Gain Score Test, Wilcoxon Test, and Mann Whitney Test. Data processing used SPSS Version 22. The results showed an N-Gain Score of 0.27, G < 0.3 (low category). The results of hypothesis testing are: (1) There were differences in student learning outcomes before and after using the Problem-Solving method with a significance value of 0.002 < 0.005. (2) There was no difference in student learning outcomes before and after using the Recitation method with a significance value of 0.399 > 0.05. (3) There was no difference in student learning outcomes between those using the Problem Solving method and the Recitation method with a significance value of 0.435 > 0.05.","PeriodicalId":340929,"journal":{"name":"Economic Education Analysis Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Education Analysis Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/eeaj.v11i3.61664","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the difference in the level of student learning success using the Problem-Solving method and the Recitation method in learning Automation of Public Relations and Protocol Governance at SMK Negeri 3 Padang using Quasi-Experimental type with Noneequivalent Control Group Design. The population of this study was 61 students with a sample of all parts of the population. The sampling technique was Total Sampling. The research instrument was in the form of test questions. The data analysis technique used was descriptive analysis, Prerequisite Analysis Test, namely Normality Test and Homogeneity Test, N-Gain Score Test, Wilcoxon Test, and Mann Whitney Test. Data processing used SPSS Version 22. The results showed an N-Gain Score of 0.27, G < 0.3 (low category). The results of hypothesis testing are: (1) There were differences in student learning outcomes before and after using the Problem-Solving method with a significance value of 0.002 < 0.005. (2) There was no difference in student learning outcomes before and after using the Recitation method with a significance value of 0.399 > 0.05. (3) There was no difference in student learning outcomes between those using the Problem Solving method and the Recitation method with a significance value of 0.435 > 0.05.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公共关系与协议性学习中问题解决法与背诵法学生学习成功的比较
本研究采用准实验型非等效控制组设计,探讨在巴东SMK Negeri 3的公共关系与礼仪治理自动化课程中,采用问题解决法和背诵法的学生学习成功水平的差异。这项研究的总体是61名学生,样本来自总体的各个部分。抽样方法为全抽样。研究工具是以试题的形式出现的。数据分析采用描述性分析、前提分析检验,即正态性检验和齐性检验、n -增益分数检验、Wilcoxon检验和Mann Whitney检验。数据处理使用SPSS Version 22。结果表明:N-Gain Score为0.27,G < 0.3(低类)。假设检验的结果是:(1)使用问题解决方法前后学生的学习成果存在显著性差异,显著性值为0.002 < 0.005。(2)采用背诵法前后学生学习效果无显著性差异,显著性值为0.399 > 0.05。(3)问题解决法与背诵法在学生学习效果上无显著性差异,显著性值为0.435 > 0.05。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cashless Society and Financial Literacy in Campus Life to Support Accountable Financial Management Building Destination Competitiveness Through Memorable Tourism Experience The Influence of Financial Literacy, M-Banking Services on Saving Behavior Moderated by Gender and Self-Control Analysis of Elements Business Model in Coffee Shop Indications of Creeping Acquisition through Rights Issues in Indonesian Non Financial Companies during 2018-2021
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1