Any Justification for Creative Accounting: Where Are Fraud, Examiners?

G. Oyedokun
{"title":"Any Justification for Creative Accounting: Where Are Fraud, Examiners?","authors":"G. Oyedokun","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3272415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The slippery slope is described as ‘playing the system’, ‘beating the system’, and fundamentally neglecting the laid down rules, regulation within the system for selfish reasons. This presentation revealed the justification, ethical or otherwise for creative accounting, aggressive earnings management and related concepts as it affects the professional judgement of fraud examiners. The role of fraud examiners is put to light in ensuring that the users of financial statements are not continued to be put in the dark with respect to the state of the concerned company. This presentation also explores both positive and negative side of Creative accounting and revealed the consequences of the same within the context of fraud examination and financial reporting structures. It is concluded that The use of aggressive accounting techniques may not necessarily be fraudulent. However, it may be the start of a slippery slope, where legitimate earnings management descends into earnings manipulation or fraudulent accounting. This presentation recommends that fraud examiners should take seriously the ACFE code of ethics in resolving the allegation of fraudulent activities as may also concern creative accounting by seeing the bigger picture.","PeriodicalId":274826,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Academic Accounting Association (CAAA)","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Academic Accounting Association (CAAA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3272415","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The slippery slope is described as ‘playing the system’, ‘beating the system’, and fundamentally neglecting the laid down rules, regulation within the system for selfish reasons. This presentation revealed the justification, ethical or otherwise for creative accounting, aggressive earnings management and related concepts as it affects the professional judgement of fraud examiners. The role of fraud examiners is put to light in ensuring that the users of financial statements are not continued to be put in the dark with respect to the state of the concerned company. This presentation also explores both positive and negative side of Creative accounting and revealed the consequences of the same within the context of fraud examination and financial reporting structures. It is concluded that The use of aggressive accounting techniques may not necessarily be fraudulent. However, it may be the start of a slippery slope, where legitimate earnings management descends into earnings manipulation or fraudulent accounting. This presentation recommends that fraud examiners should take seriously the ACFE code of ethics in resolving the allegation of fraudulent activities as may also concern creative accounting by seeing the bigger picture.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创造性会计的任何理由:欺诈在哪里,审查员?
滑坡效应被描述为“玩弄系统”,“击败系统”,从根本上忽视了既定的规则,系统内的监管出于自私的原因。该报告揭示了创造性会计、积极盈余管理和相关概念的正当性、道德或其他方面的理由,因为它影响了欺诈审查人员的专业判断。在确保财务报表的使用者不再继续对有关公司的状况一无所知时,舞弊审查人员的作用被揭示出来。本演讲还探讨了创造性会计的积极和消极方面,并揭示了在欺诈检查和财务报告结构的背景下同样的后果。结论是,使用激进的会计技术不一定是欺诈。然而,这可能是一个滑坡的开始,合法的盈余管理沦为盈余操纵或欺诈会计。本报告建议,舞弊审查人员应认真对待ACFE道德准则,以解决欺诈活动的指控,因为这也可能涉及创造性会计,通过看到更大的图景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Top Executive Turnover and Local Market Characteristics on Financial Reporting Risk CEO Implicit Motives: Their Impact on Firm Performance Transition to Ind AS and Profit Reporting of the Initial Adopters Pay for Security: Auditor Risk Response in China’s Anti Corruption Campaign The Institutional Logic Perspective: A Theoretical Framework in Explaining Management Accounting Practice Change
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1