{"title":"Temporal/locative inversion in Arabic","authors":"Marwan Jarrah","doi":"10.1515/yplm-2017-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This research scrutinizes the observation that when the thematic subject is extracted (i.e. questioned) in Jordanian Arabic, temporal/locative inversion may occur. Temporal inversion occurs irrespective of the verb being transitive or intransitive, whereas locative inversion is limited to contexts with an unaccusative verb. This research argues that this distinction correlates with the base-generation of temporal/locative adjuncts; temporal adjuncts are base-generated adjoining to TP, whereas locatives are base-generated adjoining to VP. Temporal but not locative adjuncts resist fronting with VP, demand the use of a tense copula (or a tensed verb), and are not subject to deletion along with the lexical verb. With the assumption that Spec, SubjP must be filled with a non-silent copy due to the effects of the so-called Subject Criterion (Rizzi and Shlonsky 2007), a temporal or locative adjunct, if any, fills this position instead of the extracted thematic subject. Given its low position, a locative adjunct is accessible to Subj0 only when there is no v*P, hence the account of the correlation between locative inversion and the type of the verb. Furthermore, this research explores the existence of temporal/locative inversion in other two Arabic dialects (Najdi Arabic and Iraqi Arabic), arguing for a micro-parametric view of this strategy across Arabic dialects.","PeriodicalId":431433,"journal":{"name":"Yearbook of the Poznan Linguistic Meeting","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yearbook of the Poznan Linguistic Meeting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/yplm-2017-0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Abstract
Abstract This research scrutinizes the observation that when the thematic subject is extracted (i.e. questioned) in Jordanian Arabic, temporal/locative inversion may occur. Temporal inversion occurs irrespective of the verb being transitive or intransitive, whereas locative inversion is limited to contexts with an unaccusative verb. This research argues that this distinction correlates with the base-generation of temporal/locative adjuncts; temporal adjuncts are base-generated adjoining to TP, whereas locatives are base-generated adjoining to VP. Temporal but not locative adjuncts resist fronting with VP, demand the use of a tense copula (or a tensed verb), and are not subject to deletion along with the lexical verb. With the assumption that Spec, SubjP must be filled with a non-silent copy due to the effects of the so-called Subject Criterion (Rizzi and Shlonsky 2007), a temporal or locative adjunct, if any, fills this position instead of the extracted thematic subject. Given its low position, a locative adjunct is accessible to Subj0 only when there is no v*P, hence the account of the correlation between locative inversion and the type of the verb. Furthermore, this research explores the existence of temporal/locative inversion in other two Arabic dialects (Najdi Arabic and Iraqi Arabic), arguing for a micro-parametric view of this strategy across Arabic dialects.
摘要本研究考察了约旦阿拉伯语中主位主语提取(即提问)时可能出现的时间/位置倒置现象。无论动词是及物动词还是不及物动词,时间倒装都会发生,而位置倒装仅限于带有非宾格动词的语境。本研究认为,这种差异与时间/位置修饰词的基础生成有关;时间修饰词是毗邻TP的碱基生成的,而位置修饰词是毗邻VP的碱基生成的。时间而不是位置的修饰语抵制用VP作为前面,要求使用时态连词(或时态动词),并且不能与词汇动词一起删除。假设由于所谓的主语标准(Rizzi and Shlonsky 2007)的影响,Spec, SubjP必须用非沉默的副本填充,如果有的话,一个时间或位置的辅助词会填充这个位置,而不是提取的主题主语。由于位置较低,主语只有在没有v*P的情况下才能使用位置助词,这就是位置倒装与动词类型之间的关系。此外,本研究还探讨了其他两种阿拉伯语方言(纳吉迪阿拉伯语和伊拉克阿拉伯语)中时间/位置倒转的存在,并论证了阿拉伯方言中这种策略的微观参数观点。