Reasoning with assumptions, defeasibly, in model formulation

H. Bhargava, R. Krishnan
{"title":"Reasoning with assumptions, defeasibly, in model formulation","authors":"H. Bhargava, R. Krishnan","doi":"10.1109/HICSS.1992.183510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors examine the relevance of reasoning with assumptions in two processes that are desired to be supported in model management systems, namely model formulation and model version management. They submit, and illustrate with an example, that the ability to represent and reason with assumptions in modeling languages could lead to significant improvement in the functionality of model management systems. The authors also argue that the process of reasoning with assumptions is non-monotonic and propose that defeasible reasoning is a useful candidate for modeling this process.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":103288,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences","volume":"98 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.1992.183510","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The authors examine the relevance of reasoning with assumptions in two processes that are desired to be supported in model management systems, namely model formulation and model version management. They submit, and illustrate with an example, that the ability to represent and reason with assumptions in modeling languages could lead to significant improvement in the functionality of model management systems. The authors also argue that the process of reasoning with assumptions is non-monotonic and propose that defeasible reasoning is a useful candidate for modeling this process.<>
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在模型制定中,用假设推理,这是不可行的
作者研究了在模型管理系统中需要支持的两个过程中的推理与假设的相关性,即模型制定和模型版本管理。他们提出,并举例说明,在建模语言中表示和推理假设的能力可以显著改善模型管理系统的功能。作者还认为,用假设推理的过程是非单调的,并提出可推翻推理是对这一过程建模的有用候选方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
AEROBA: a blackboard approach to model formulation The convergence of organizational and end-user computing Executive support in an open loop control environment ACE: Zen and the art of application building Graphic interface design for DSS dialog management: a composite graphics approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1