Economists on Economic Ethics

F. Knight
{"title":"Economists on Economic Ethics","authors":"F. Knight","doi":"10.1086/intejethi.48.1.2989303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"UDGED by reasonable standards, Getting and Earning, by Professors J Bye and Blodgett of the Department of Economics in the University of Pennsylvania, is an excellent book, and one to be strongly commended to students of economics as well as to that larger public to whom, in form and style, it is primarily addressed. It is well writtenbut not too well-and logically arranged. And it contains much penetrating and sound economic analysis, and in particular avoids many of the fallacies which an economist expects to find in a book dealing with this subject, if written from the standpoint of a more or less \"advanced\" position, in program as well as sympathies. Especially good, in the reviewer's judgment, is the chapter on wages (ethical significance of differences in money wages [chap. iii]). The repeated emphasis on the necessity of a price system as the only feasible mechanism for comparing and adjusting the innumerable conflicts of individual interest involved in any largescale economic co-operation is also a notably superior feature (cf., e.g., p. 48). The present note, however, is not intended as a book review in the conventional sense' but as an examination of issues. Hence, admittedly at the cost of seeming somewhat ungracious, it is proposed to judge the book by unreasonable standards-even to make of it a sort of bad example. The main impression which reading it has left on the present writer's mind is one of acute realization of the difficulties of the problem of criticizing the economic system in ethical terms or proposing ideals to guide efforts to improve it, and the long, long way we have to go before even the foundations are laid for anything like a satisfactory treatment of the issues. Such a treatment would, of course, presuppose and build upon \"sound\" economic analysis, and even in this preliminary task it is clear that very much remains to be done before there is general agreement on essentials among the presumptive competent. Economic principles and social policy.-Following two chapters on the statistical facts of inequality and their implications and on the meaning of earned and unearned income-more broadly the problem of economic justice and desert-the authors devote the main body of their book (chaps. iii-vi, pp. 59-2I7) to a critical examination of the four distributive shares traditional in economic discussion-interest, rent, wages, and profit. The main effort in each case is to discover the degree in which the respective","PeriodicalId":346392,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Ethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1937-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/intejethi.48.1.2989303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

UDGED by reasonable standards, Getting and Earning, by Professors J Bye and Blodgett of the Department of Economics in the University of Pennsylvania, is an excellent book, and one to be strongly commended to students of economics as well as to that larger public to whom, in form and style, it is primarily addressed. It is well writtenbut not too well-and logically arranged. And it contains much penetrating and sound economic analysis, and in particular avoids many of the fallacies which an economist expects to find in a book dealing with this subject, if written from the standpoint of a more or less "advanced" position, in program as well as sympathies. Especially good, in the reviewer's judgment, is the chapter on wages (ethical significance of differences in money wages [chap. iii]). The repeated emphasis on the necessity of a price system as the only feasible mechanism for comparing and adjusting the innumerable conflicts of individual interest involved in any largescale economic co-operation is also a notably superior feature (cf., e.g., p. 48). The present note, however, is not intended as a book review in the conventional sense' but as an examination of issues. Hence, admittedly at the cost of seeming somewhat ungracious, it is proposed to judge the book by unreasonable standards-even to make of it a sort of bad example. The main impression which reading it has left on the present writer's mind is one of acute realization of the difficulties of the problem of criticizing the economic system in ethical terms or proposing ideals to guide efforts to improve it, and the long, long way we have to go before even the foundations are laid for anything like a satisfactory treatment of the issues. Such a treatment would, of course, presuppose and build upon "sound" economic analysis, and even in this preliminary task it is clear that very much remains to be done before there is general agreement on essentials among the presumptive competent. Economic principles and social policy.-Following two chapters on the statistical facts of inequality and their implications and on the meaning of earned and unearned income-more broadly the problem of economic justice and desert-the authors devote the main body of their book (chaps. iii-vi, pp. 59-2I7) to a critical examination of the four distributive shares traditional in economic discussion-interest, rent, wages, and profit. The main effort in each case is to discover the degree in which the respective
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经济学家论经济伦理
宾西法尼亚大学经济系J拜教授和布洛杰特教授所著的《获得与收入》,以合理的标准来评判,是一本优秀的书,值得经济学专业的学生以及主要针对其形式和风格的广大公众强烈推荐。它写得很好,但不太好,而且安排得很有逻辑。它包含了许多深刻而合理的经济分析,特别是避免了经济学家期望在处理这个主题的书中发现的许多谬误,如果从一个或多或少“先进”的立场出发,在纲领和同情方面。在审稿人看来,关于工资的那一章(货币工资差异的伦理意义[第三章])尤为出色。反复强调价格制度的必要性是比较和调整任何大规模经济合作中涉及的无数个人利益冲突的唯一可行机制,这也是一个显著的优点(例如,第48页)。然而,本说明的目的不是作为传统意义上的书评,而是作为对问题的审查。因此,有人建议用不合理的标准来评判这本书——甚至把它当作一种坏榜样,这固然显得有些不礼貌。阅读此书给笔者留下的主要印象是,我敏锐地意识到,从伦理学的角度来批评经济体系,或者提出理想来指导改进经济体系的努力,这些问题是多么困难,我们甚至要为令人满意地处理这些问题奠定基础,还有很长的路要走。当然,这样的处理将以“健全的”经济分析为前提和基础,即使在这项初步任务中,很明显,在假定的主管人员就要点达成普遍协议之前,还有很多工作要做。经济原则和社会政策。在两章关于不平等的统计事实及其影响,以及关于挣得收入和非挣得收入的意义——更广泛地说,是经济公正和应得的问题——之后,作者将他们的书的主体(第11章)奉献出来。iii-vi,第59- 27页),对经济讨论中传统的四种分配份额——利息、租金、工资和利润——进行批判性考察。在每种情况下,主要的努力是发现各自的程度
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mastery learning of toxicology life support skills by nurses and doctors, utilizing simulation technology in Nepal Role of Forensic Nurses in the mortuary and postmortem examination An overview of sexual assault cases in Bangladesh Risks, hazards and safety in mortuaries Nut case in ER: ISTOLS Toxidromal Approach by Indian Society of Toxicology in managing botanical emergencies due to Areca Catechu - Betel Nuts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1