A Matter for Professional Judgement in the Matter of the Perfect Profits PLC Pension Scheme

James H. Macneill, J. Stephens, T. M. Ross
{"title":"A Matter for Professional Judgement in the Matter of the Perfect Profits PLC Pension Scheme","authors":"James H. Macneill, J. Stephens, T. M. Ross","doi":"10.1017/S0071368600010156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In giving their advice, actuaries form part of a complex series of interlocking relationships – pensions advice must take account of the Trust Deed, the Faculty's and the Institute's Rules of Professional Conduct and the law.The law is paramount as interpreted by judges. Lawyers and judges have little difficulty in investigating transactions of many years ago – what was deemed normal and proper by actuaries then could well not be perceived by the court as reasonable – either then or now. The fact that everyone does it may be a defence against negligence – or it may not.","PeriodicalId":121129,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of the Faculty of Actuaries","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of the Faculty of Actuaries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0071368600010156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In giving their advice, actuaries form part of a complex series of interlocking relationships – pensions advice must take account of the Trust Deed, the Faculty's and the Institute's Rules of Professional Conduct and the law.The law is paramount as interpreted by judges. Lawyers and judges have little difficulty in investigating transactions of many years ago – what was deemed normal and proper by actuaries then could well not be perceived by the court as reasonable – either then or now. The fact that everyone does it may be a defence against negligence – or it may not.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于完美利润PLC养老金计划的专业判断问题
在提供建议时,精算师构成了一系列复杂的连锁关系的一部分——养老金建议必须考虑信托契约、学院和协会的职业行为规则以及法律。法官对法律的解释是至高无上的。律师和法官在调查多年前的交易时几乎没有什么困难——当时被精算师视为正常和适当的事情,很可能在当时或现在被法院认为是不合理的。每个人都这么做的事实可能是对疏忽的辩护,也可能不是。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Improving the Performance of Equity Portfolios Marketing of Retail Financial Services Objectives and Methods of Funding Defined Benefit Pension Schemes A Market Equilibrium Model for the Management of Ordinary Share Portfolios Proposals for the Statutory Basis of Valuation of the Liabilities of Long-Term Insurance Business
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1