Effective search for potentially innovative scientific results in medicine

M. B. Khrustalev, A. A. Maksimova
{"title":"Effective search for potentially innovative scientific results in medicine","authors":"M. B. Khrustalev, A. A. Maksimova","doi":"10.17749/2070-4909.2019.12.1.27-33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Medicine is one of the most important and rapidly developing branches of science. Research and developments projects run by scientific organizations and universities in this field are ultimately aimed at preserving the public health; these projects are expected to be rapidly implemented and become available to consumers. Yet in the area of medicine, the process of implementation can take many years. There is a gap between the developers (scientific organization, university), investors, and manufacturers due to the difficulty in assessing the innovation potential of the scientific results in medicine. The aim of this study was to determine the inclusion criteria for research conducted in medical universities to be incorporated in the innovation process; such criteria were supposed to be based on other (indirect) indicators ranking the medical universities. Material and methods. The study included twenty medical universities in Russia, largest in terms of the scientific and teaching staff. These universities were ranked according to the number of citations in the Web of Science over the period 2013-2017. Also, using the SciVal module developed by Elsevier, the number of publications with the participation of industrial partners was estimated. The assessment of the invention activity of medical universities was found in the materials published by the Russian Analytical Center “Expert”. Results. According to the scientometric analysis, medical universities with the most promising scientific products and scientific developments, have been in low demand by Russian and foreign companies. Conclusion. Due to the low activity of medical universities in implementing their intellectual production, potential investors and manufacturers should pay more attention to those medical universities, which produce a greater number of high-quality scientific results.","PeriodicalId":201824,"journal":{"name":"FARMAKOEKONOMIKA. Modern Pharmacoeconomic and Pharmacoepidemiology","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FARMAKOEKONOMIKA. Modern Pharmacoeconomic and Pharmacoepidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17749/2070-4909.2019.12.1.27-33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Medicine is one of the most important and rapidly developing branches of science. Research and developments projects run by scientific organizations and universities in this field are ultimately aimed at preserving the public health; these projects are expected to be rapidly implemented and become available to consumers. Yet in the area of medicine, the process of implementation can take many years. There is a gap between the developers (scientific organization, university), investors, and manufacturers due to the difficulty in assessing the innovation potential of the scientific results in medicine. The aim of this study was to determine the inclusion criteria for research conducted in medical universities to be incorporated in the innovation process; such criteria were supposed to be based on other (indirect) indicators ranking the medical universities. Material and methods. The study included twenty medical universities in Russia, largest in terms of the scientific and teaching staff. These universities were ranked according to the number of citations in the Web of Science over the period 2013-2017. Also, using the SciVal module developed by Elsevier, the number of publications with the participation of industrial partners was estimated. The assessment of the invention activity of medical universities was found in the materials published by the Russian Analytical Center “Expert”. Results. According to the scientometric analysis, medical universities with the most promising scientific products and scientific developments, have been in low demand by Russian and foreign companies. Conclusion. Due to the low activity of medical universities in implementing their intellectual production, potential investors and manufacturers should pay more attention to those medical universities, which produce a greater number of high-quality scientific results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对医学领域潜在创新科学成果的有效搜索
医学是科学中最重要和发展最迅速的分支之一。科学组织和大学在这一领域开展的研究和发展项目的最终目的是维护公众健康;预计这些项目将迅速实施并可供消费者使用。然而,在医学领域,实施过程可能需要多年时间。由于难以对医学科研成果的创新潜力进行评估,因此在研发方(科研机构、高校)、投资者和制造商之间存在着差距。本研究的目的是确定医学院校进行的研究纳入创新过程的标准;这些标准应该是基于对医科大学进行排名的其他(间接)指标。材料和方法。这项研究包括俄罗斯20所医学大学,就科学和教学人员而言,这些大学是最大的。这些大学的排名是根据2013-2017年科学网的引用次数进行的。此外,利用爱思唯尔开发的SciVal模块,估计了有工业伙伴参与的出版物数量。在俄罗斯分析中心“专家”出版的材料中发现了对医科大学发明活动的评估。结果。根据科学计量分析,俄罗斯和外国公司对拥有最有前途的科学产品和科学发展的医科大学的需求很低。结论。由于医学院校实施智力生产的活跃度较低,潜在的投资者和制造商应该更多地关注那些产生更多高质量科学成果的医学院校。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Chemoreactome screening of pharmaceutical effects on SARS-CoV-2 and human virome to help decide on drug-based COVID-19 therapy Impact of disease information (Ebola and COVID-19) on the pharmaceutical sector in Russia and USA Analysis of the availability and affordability of pharmaceuticals for children in need of palliative care Comparative effectiveness of simultaneous and staged operations in patients with atherosclerotic lesions of carotid and coronary arteries Systematic computer analysis of published literature on nutritional support for vaccination
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1