DETERMINATION OF RESIDUAL EFFECT OF INDAZIFLAM AND AMICARBAZONE IN TWO SOILS THROUGH BIOASSAY

Q. Savaris, M. Inoue, K. F. Mendes, C. Maciel, E. O. Helvig
{"title":"DETERMINATION OF RESIDUAL EFFECT OF INDAZIFLAM AND AMICARBAZONE IN TWO SOILS THROUGH BIOASSAY","authors":"Q. Savaris, M. Inoue, K. F. Mendes, C. Maciel, E. O. Helvig","doi":"10.7824/rbh.v18i3.617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The herbicides indaziflam and amicarbazone effectively control weeds, as they persist for long extensions in the soil. The objective of this work was to evaluate the residual effect of indaziflam and amicarbazone in contrasting textures. Two experiments were conducted, one experiment for each herbicide using a the randomized block design, with four replications, in a 2x6+1 factorial scheme, that is, two types of soils, six application times (0, 20, 40, 60, 80 and 100 days after application - DAA) and a control. Used as doses of 100 and 1.400 g ha-1, for indaziflam and amicarbazone, respectively. At each evaluation period, the cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) was sown and the visual intoxication of the species was measured at 21 days after sowing. At 0, 20 and 40 DAA of amicarbazone, phytointoxication was 100% for both soils. It was observed at 100 DAA, ditostically reducing phytointoxication, close to 0%, in sandy soil (DT50 @ 56 days) and 30% in clayey soil (DT50 @ 59 days). Indaziflam provided 100% phytointoxication at all times. It was concluded that the indaziflam had greater residual activity than amicarbazone, regardless of the soil. Already, for the amicarbazone, the effect was higher on the clay texture.","PeriodicalId":265066,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Herbicidas","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Herbicidas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7824/rbh.v18i3.617","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The herbicides indaziflam and amicarbazone effectively control weeds, as they persist for long extensions in the soil. The objective of this work was to evaluate the residual effect of indaziflam and amicarbazone in contrasting textures. Two experiments were conducted, one experiment for each herbicide using a the randomized block design, with four replications, in a 2x6+1 factorial scheme, that is, two types of soils, six application times (0, 20, 40, 60, 80 and 100 days after application - DAA) and a control. Used as doses of 100 and 1.400 g ha-1, for indaziflam and amicarbazone, respectively. At each evaluation period, the cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) was sown and the visual intoxication of the species was measured at 21 days after sowing. At 0, 20 and 40 DAA of amicarbazone, phytointoxication was 100% for both soils. It was observed at 100 DAA, ditostically reducing phytointoxication, close to 0%, in sandy soil (DT50 @ 56 days) and 30% in clayey soil (DT50 @ 59 days). Indaziflam provided 100% phytointoxication at all times. It was concluded that the indaziflam had greater residual activity than amicarbazone, regardless of the soil. Already, for the amicarbazone, the effect was higher on the clay texture.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生物测定法测定茚地夫兰和氨基脲酮在两种土壤中的残留效果
由于杂草在土壤中长时间存在,除草剂吲唑吡喃和氨基脲能有效地控制杂草。本研究的目的是评价茚地夫兰和氨基脲酮在不同质地下的残留效果。2个试验采用随机区组设计,每种除草剂1个试验,4个重复,2 × 6+1因子方案,即2种土壤类型,6个施用量(施药后0、20、40、60、80和100 d)和1个对照。分别以100和1.400 g / ha / 1剂量用于茚地夫兰和氨基脲。在每个评价期播种黄瓜(Cucumis sativus L.),并在播种后21天测量该品种的视觉中毒情况。在氨基脲浓度为0、20和40 DAA时,两种土壤的植物中毒率均为100%。在100 DAA时观察到,在沙质土壤(DT50 @ 56天)和粘土土壤(DT50 @ 59天)中,单胞性地减少植物中毒,接近0%,30%。茚地夫兰在任何时候都提供100%的植物中毒。结果表明,在不同土壤条件下,茚地夫兰的残留活性均高于氨基脲。对于氨基脲来说,它对粘土质地的影响更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CONTROLE DE SOJA VOLUNTÁRIA COM HERBICIDAS REGISTRADOS PARA ALGODOEIRO PRE-EMERGENT HERBICIDE APPLICATION PERFORMED AFTER CROP SOWING FAVORS PIGWEED (AMARANTHUS SPP.) AND WHITE-EYE (RICHARDIA BRASILIENSIS) CONTROL IN SOYBEANS CONTROLE DE Cyperus difformis L. POR HERBICIDAS ALS E MIMETIZADORES DE AUXINAS ESTUDO DE SELEÇÃO DA COMUNIDADE INFESTANTE POR HERBICIDAS UTILIZANDO TÉCNICAS DE ANÁLISE MULTIVARIADA CONTROLE QUÍMICO DE PLANTAS VOLUNTÁRIAS DE SOJA E ALGODÃO TOLERANTES A DICAMBA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1