We Both Grieved: Adoption, Abortion, and the Callous Indifference of Dobbs

Susan Bordo
{"title":"We Both Grieved: Adoption, Abortion, and the Callous Indifference of Dobbs","authors":"Susan Bordo","doi":"10.1353/ado.0.0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"My experience as an adoptive mother who got to know my daughter’s birthmother during her pregnancy demonstrates the inhumanity of the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision, which turns pregnancy into a fetal delivery system rather than a profoundly transformative experience. This de-humanization undergirds both the Alito/Barrett attitude toward abortion and adoption and the babies who are imagined as refilling diminished stock for the market in babies.","PeriodicalId":140707,"journal":{"name":"Adoption & Culture","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adoption & Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ado.0.0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

My experience as an adoptive mother who got to know my daughter’s birthmother during her pregnancy demonstrates the inhumanity of the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision, which turns pregnancy into a fetal delivery system rather than a profoundly transformative experience. This de-humanization undergirds both the Alito/Barrett attitude toward abortion and adoption and the babies who are imagined as refilling diminished stock for the market in babies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们都很伤心:收养,堕胎,和多布斯的冷漠
作为一名养母,我在女儿怀孕期间认识了她的生母,我的经历证明了多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织(Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization)一案的裁决是不人道的,它把怀孕变成了一种胎儿分娩系统,而不是一种深刻的变革经历。这种非人性化强化了阿利托/巴雷特对堕胎和收养的态度,也强化了婴儿被想象为填补婴儿市场上减少的库存。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Introduction: The Dobbs Issue Taking Children: A History of American Terror by Laura Briggs, and: Legitimating Life: Adoption in the Age of Globalization and Biotechnology by Sonja van Wichelen (review) Originalism: Erasing Women from the Body Politic Separation, Sorrow, and Silence: What Birth Mothers and Birth Searching in Children’s Literature Can Teach Us About the Abortion v. Adoption Debate The Dobbs Decision and the (False) Adoption “Option,” A Personal Essay of “Ambiguous Loss”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1