Comparison of methods for prediction of nephrotoxicity during development.

J Klein, G Koren, S M MacLeod
{"title":"Comparison of methods for prediction of nephrotoxicity during development.","authors":"J Klein,&nbsp;G Koren,&nbsp;S M MacLeod","doi":"10.1159/000457468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Drugs with nephrotoxic potential are continuously introduced into perinatal and pediatric medicine, and assessment of their relative toxicity is important. We compared different methods of assessment of renal damage during development in an attempt to establish their relative sensitivity, age and dose dependence. Newborn, 6- to 8-day-old and adult rats were treated for 7 days with intramuscular gentamicin (5, 10 or 20 mg/kg/day) or amikacin (5, 20 or 40 mg/kg/day). Renal damage was assessed by serum and urine creatinine, urine N-acetyl beta-glucosaminidase and beta 2-microglobulin, cortical sphingomyelinase in vivo and in vitro and morphologic changes in light and electron microscopy. As expected, there was a dose-dependent damage, with gentamicin being more nephrotoxic than amikacin, and with newborn rats more resistant. The light- and electron-microscopic assessment were more sensitive than all other methods, followed by urinary N-acetyl glucosaminidase and then by beta 2-microglobulin. Sphingomyelinase changes occurred only at the highest doses of gentamicin.</p>","PeriodicalId":11160,"journal":{"name":"Developmental pharmacology and therapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000457468","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental pharmacology and therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000457468","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Drugs with nephrotoxic potential are continuously introduced into perinatal and pediatric medicine, and assessment of their relative toxicity is important. We compared different methods of assessment of renal damage during development in an attempt to establish their relative sensitivity, age and dose dependence. Newborn, 6- to 8-day-old and adult rats were treated for 7 days with intramuscular gentamicin (5, 10 or 20 mg/kg/day) or amikacin (5, 20 or 40 mg/kg/day). Renal damage was assessed by serum and urine creatinine, urine N-acetyl beta-glucosaminidase and beta 2-microglobulin, cortical sphingomyelinase in vivo and in vitro and morphologic changes in light and electron microscopy. As expected, there was a dose-dependent damage, with gentamicin being more nephrotoxic than amikacin, and with newborn rats more resistant. The light- and electron-microscopic assessment were more sensitive than all other methods, followed by urinary N-acetyl glucosaminidase and then by beta 2-microglobulin. Sphingomyelinase changes occurred only at the highest doses of gentamicin.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
发育期间肾毒性预测方法的比较。
具有潜在肾毒性的药物不断被引入围产期和儿科医学,评估其相对毒性是重要的。我们比较了不同的评估肾脏损害的方法,试图建立他们的相对敏感性,年龄和剂量依赖性。新生大鼠、6 ~ 8日龄大鼠和成年大鼠分别肌肉注射庆大霉素(5、10或20 mg/kg/天)或阿米卡星(5、20或40 mg/kg/天)7天。采用体内、体外血清、尿肌酐、尿n -乙酰-氨基葡萄糖苷酶、β 2微球蛋白、皮质鞘磷脂酶及光镜、电镜观察肾损害情况。正如预期的那样,存在剂量依赖性损害,庆大霉素比阿米卡星肾毒性更大,新生大鼠更耐药。光镜和电镜检测灵敏度最高,尿n-乙酰氨基葡萄糖酶检测次之,β 2微球蛋白检测次之。鞘磷脂酶的变化只发生在最高剂量的庆大霉素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analgesia and sedation in neonatal intensive care using fentanyl by continuous infusion. Effect of calcium channel agonist (BAY K8644) on volatile anesthetic-mediated depression in neonatal rabbit papillary muscle. Mechanisms of increased sensitivity to A2 adenosine receptor stimulation in immature rabbit aortic rings. Pharmacokinetics of paracetamol in the neonate and infant after administration of propacetamol chlorhydrate. Population pharmacokinetics of ceftizoxime in premature newborns.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1