Comparative Study of Digital Fingerprint Quality Assessment Metrics

Zhigang Yao, J. L. Bars, C. Charrier, C. Rosenberger
{"title":"Comparative Study of Digital Fingerprint Quality Assessment Metrics","authors":"Zhigang Yao, J. L. Bars, C. Charrier, C. Rosenberger","doi":"10.1109/ICB2018.2018.00014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The quality assessment of biometric data proceeds as a toll to decide whether a biometric sample may be used to generate the user's reference template. Many studies showed its signi?cant impact on the subsequent performance of the biometric system. Since many metrics are proposed for this purpose by researchers or standardization institutions, their relevance should be studied in particular to evaluate their relative usefulness. This paper provides a comparative study of fingerprint quality assessment (FQA) metrics. We consider the enrollment selection validation approach to perform an objective comparison of them. We show the efficiency of 7 well known FQA metrics on 9 datasets. Results show a dependency of these metrics to the dataset (i.e. the fingerprint sensor) and for matchers a similar behavior.","PeriodicalId":130957,"journal":{"name":"2018 International Conference on Biometrics (ICB)","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 International Conference on Biometrics (ICB)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICB2018.2018.00014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The quality assessment of biometric data proceeds as a toll to decide whether a biometric sample may be used to generate the user's reference template. Many studies showed its signi?cant impact on the subsequent performance of the biometric system. Since many metrics are proposed for this purpose by researchers or standardization institutions, their relevance should be studied in particular to evaluate their relative usefulness. This paper provides a comparative study of fingerprint quality assessment (FQA) metrics. We consider the enrollment selection validation approach to perform an objective comparison of them. We show the efficiency of 7 well known FQA metrics on 9 datasets. Results show a dependency of these metrics to the dataset (i.e. the fingerprint sensor) and for matchers a similar behavior.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字指纹质量评价指标的比较研究
生物特征数据的质量评估作为决定生物特征样本是否可用于生成用户参考模板的一个步骤。许多研究都显示了它的迹象。不会影响生物识别系统的后续性能。由于研究人员或标准化机构为此目的提出了许多度量标准,因此应特别研究它们的相关性,以评估它们的相对有用性。本文对指纹质量评价(FQA)指标进行了比较研究。我们考虑入组选择验证方法来对它们进行客观比较。我们在9个数据集上展示了7个众所周知的FQA指标的效率。结果显示这些指标依赖于数据集(即指纹传感器),并且对于匹配器有类似的行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Conformal Mapping of a 3D Face Representation onto a 2D Image for CNN Based Face Recognition Two-Stream Part-Based Deep Representation for Human Attribute Recognition SSBC 2018: Sclera Segmentation Benchmarking Competition Multifactor User Authentication with In-Air-Handwriting and Hand Geometry Evolutionary Methods for Generating Synthetic MasterPrint Templates: Dictionary Attack in Fingerprint Recognition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1