Conclusion

Shreya Atrey
{"title":"Conclusion","authors":"Shreya Atrey","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198848950.003.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This conclusion closes the book with a reminder that the endeavour to have the traditional model of discrimination law fit intersectionality may be ill-conceived. It thus highlights the urgency of remoulding discrimination law for the purposes of a distinct category of intersectional discrimination per se. It reiterates the theoretical and doctrinal steps needed to do this. The book concludes by seeing the present work as just one part of intersectionality’s transformative agenda and it underscores the significance of broader non-judicial efforts in realizing intersectionality catholically.","PeriodicalId":115138,"journal":{"name":"Intersectional Discrimination","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intersectional Discrimination","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198848950.003.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This conclusion closes the book with a reminder that the endeavour to have the traditional model of discrimination law fit intersectionality may be ill-conceived. It thus highlights the urgency of remoulding discrimination law for the purposes of a distinct category of intersectional discrimination per se. It reiterates the theoretical and doctrinal steps needed to do this. The book concludes by seeing the present work as just one part of intersectionality’s transformative agenda and it underscores the significance of broader non-judicial efforts in realizing intersectionality catholically.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结论
这一结论提醒我们,让传统的歧视法模型适应交叉性的努力可能是考虑不周的。因此,它突出了迫切需要为一种不同类别的交叉歧视本身的目的而修改反歧视法。它重申了这样做所需的理论和理论步骤。这本书的结论是,把目前的工作看作是交叉性变革议程的一部分,它强调了在实现交叉性方面更广泛的非司法努力的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Conclusion The Concept The Theory The Project
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1