Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, 1951

{"title":"Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, 1951","authors":"","doi":"10.1017/9781316677117.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SUMMARY: The facts: —Mr and Mrs Cheng, who were nationals of the People's Republic of China, had five children despite the restrictions on family size imposed by birth control legislation. Having entered France, they applied for recognition as refugees under the provisions of the Geneva Convention of 1951 and the New York Protocol of 1967, arguing that the Chinese authorities would punish them for the birth of their last child by forced sterilization. Their application was rejected by the French Office for the Protection of Refugees (OFPRA) and the Refugee Appeals Commission. They then applied to the Conseil dEtat for those decisions to be quashed.","PeriodicalId":248835,"journal":{"name":"International Human Rights Law Documents","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"112","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Human Rights Law Documents","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316677117.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 112

Abstract

SUMMARY: The facts: —Mr and Mrs Cheng, who were nationals of the People's Republic of China, had five children despite the restrictions on family size imposed by birth control legislation. Having entered France, they applied for recognition as refugees under the provisions of the Geneva Convention of 1951 and the New York Protocol of 1967, arguing that the Chinese authorities would punish them for the birth of their last child by forced sterilization. Their application was rejected by the French Office for the Protection of Refugees (OFPRA) and the Refugee Appeals Commission. They then applied to the Conseil dEtat for those decisions to be quashed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1951年《关于难民地位的公约》
摘要:事实:郑先生和郑太太是中华人民共和国公民,尽管计划生育法律对家庭规模有限制,但他们有五个孩子。进入法国后,他们根据1951年的《日内瓦公约》和1967年的《纽约议定书》的规定,申请被承认为难民。他们辩称,中国当局将以强制绝育的方式惩罚他们生下最后一个孩子。他们的申请被法国保护难民办事处和难民申诉委员会拒绝。他们于是向上诉委员会申请撤销这些决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations “Protect, Respect and Remedy” Framework, 2011 European Social Charter (Revised), 1996 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948 International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families, 1990 Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict, 2000
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1