THE HISTORIOGRAPHY AND THE POLITICS OF MEMORY

A.B. Anikina, A. L. Kaulin
{"title":"THE HISTORIOGRAPHY AND THE POLITICS OF MEMORY","authors":"A.B. Anikina, A. L. Kaulin","doi":"10.47850/10.47850/RL.2021.2.1.5-13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The prevailing opinion among the scholars is that history as a study should determine the politics of memory and serve as a model for the narratives of collective identity. However, it should be remembered that memory and history, despite their close relationship, have different goals and realize different functions in society. Historical science cannot define the collective memory, but must participate in shaping the politics of memory. The task of historical politics is precisely to cut off multiplicity in order to provide an opportunity for action, while the task of historical science as a whole is to preserve and increase the potential of multiplicity to provide a wide choice of possible actions.","PeriodicalId":370810,"journal":{"name":"Respublica literaria","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respublica literaria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47850/10.47850/RL.2021.2.1.5-13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The prevailing opinion among the scholars is that history as a study should determine the politics of memory and serve as a model for the narratives of collective identity. However, it should be remembered that memory and history, despite their close relationship, have different goals and realize different functions in society. Historical science cannot define the collective memory, but must participate in shaping the politics of memory. The task of historical politics is precisely to cut off multiplicity in order to provide an opportunity for action, while the task of historical science as a whole is to preserve and increase the potential of multiplicity to provide a wide choice of possible actions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
历史编纂学和记忆政治
学者们普遍认为,作为一门研究的历史应该决定记忆的政治,并作为集体身份叙事的典范。然而,应该记住的是,记忆和历史虽然关系密切,但在社会中有着不同的目标和实现不同的功能。历史科学不能定义集体记忆,但必须参与塑造记忆的政治。历史政治学的任务恰恰是切断多样性,以便为行动提供机会,而历史科学作为一个整体的任务是保持和增加多样性的潜力,以便为可能的行动提供广泛的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Classical philosophy in Novosibirsk Scientific Center. The pages of history The Philosophical Studies in Antiquity: Chapter of History THE CONCEPT OF UTILITY IN CHARLES SANDERS PEIRCE'S PRAGMATISM IN A LABYRINTH OF CONTEXTS. Book Review: Philosophy and Its History. Discussions: Textbook / editor, introduction, translation and comments by M. N. Volf. Novosibirsk, 2021. 239 p. COMPARATIVE CONCEPTOLOGY OF POWER AND RESISTANCE USING GOOGLE NGRAM BOOKS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1