Comparison of the efficacy of the IELS against the previous studies

A. Althobaiti
{"title":"Comparison of the efficacy of the IELS against the previous studies","authors":"A. Althobaiti","doi":"10.1109/ICITM.2017.7917922","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IELS is a web application that contains a number of elements developed together using the PHP language to form the Interactive Electronic Lecture System (IELS). This paper aims to evaluate the efficacy of the IELS compared to previous studies conducted to enhance and improve the lecturing process. A number of issues were taken into consideration in the comparison such as accessibility, usability, interactivity, learnability, communication, and satisfaction. To check the reliability of these issues factor analysis was conducted. Other issues considered when evaluating the IELS compared to the previous studies included student learning outcomes, their exchange information and their interaction with the lecture content.","PeriodicalId":340270,"journal":{"name":"2017 6th International Conference on Industrial Technology and Management (ICITM)","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 6th International Conference on Industrial Technology and Management (ICITM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICITM.2017.7917922","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IELS is a web application that contains a number of elements developed together using the PHP language to form the Interactive Electronic Lecture System (IELS). This paper aims to evaluate the efficacy of the IELS compared to previous studies conducted to enhance and improve the lecturing process. A number of issues were taken into consideration in the comparison such as accessibility, usability, interactivity, learnability, communication, and satisfaction. To check the reliability of these issues factor analysis was conducted. Other issues considered when evaluating the IELS compared to the previous studies included student learning outcomes, their exchange information and their interaction with the lecture content.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
IELS与以往研究的疗效比较
IELS是一个web应用程序,它包含了使用PHP语言共同开发的许多元素,以形成交互式电子讲座系统(IELS)。本文旨在评估IELS的有效性,并与以往的研究进行比较,以加强和改善讲课过程。在比较中考虑了许多问题,如可访问性、可用性、交互性、可学习性、沟通和满意度。为了检验这些问题的可靠性,我们进行了因子分析。与之前的研究相比,在评估雅思考试时考虑的其他问题包括学生的学习成果、他们的交流信息以及他们与讲座内容的互动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The digital future has many names—How business process management drives the digital transformation The knowledge spillover resulting from the mobility of knowledge workers Measurement and preliminary analysis of powertrain vibrations in vehicle production environment Health care monitoring system in Internet of Things (IoT) by using RFID An integrated customer relationship management and Data Mining framework for customer classification and risk analysis in health sector
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1