Mutual Fund Performance, Management Teams, and Boards

John C. Adams, Takeshi Nishikawa, R. Rao
{"title":"Mutual Fund Performance, Management Teams, and Boards","authors":"John C. Adams, Takeshi Nishikawa, R. Rao","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2251191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The recent surge in the use of team-managed funds in the mutual fund industry suggests that the benefits of team management might outweigh its costs. However, extant empirical evidence is not consistent with the view that team-managed funds generate superior returns relative to individual-managed funds. We argue that the benefits of team management are likely to be manifested in the presence of strong board monitoring because the potential free-rider problems within team-managed funds are alleviated. Our findings, that smaller boards and boards with a higher proportion of independent directors are positively associated with performance in team but not individual-managed funds, are consistent with this view. Our results suggest that in team-managed fund structures, where the potential free-riding problems exist, the presence of strong board monitoring improves fund performance.","PeriodicalId":174886,"journal":{"name":"Strategy & Organizational Behavior eJournal","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"47","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategy & Organizational Behavior eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2251191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 47

Abstract

The recent surge in the use of team-managed funds in the mutual fund industry suggests that the benefits of team management might outweigh its costs. However, extant empirical evidence is not consistent with the view that team-managed funds generate superior returns relative to individual-managed funds. We argue that the benefits of team management are likely to be manifested in the presence of strong board monitoring because the potential free-rider problems within team-managed funds are alleviated. Our findings, that smaller boards and boards with a higher proportion of independent directors are positively associated with performance in team but not individual-managed funds, are consistent with this view. Our results suggest that in team-managed fund structures, where the potential free-riding problems exist, the presence of strong board monitoring improves fund performance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
共同基金业绩、管理团队和董事会
最近在共同基金行业,团队管理基金的使用激增,这表明团队管理的好处可能大于成本。然而,现有的经验证据与团队管理的基金相对于个人管理的基金产生更高回报的观点并不一致。我们认为,团队管理的好处很可能在强有力的董事会监督下体现出来,因为团队管理基金内部潜在的搭便车问题得到了缓解。我们的研究发现,规模较小的董事会和独立董事比例较高的董事会与团队管理基金的绩效呈正相关,而与个人管理基金的绩效无关,这与上述观点一致。我们的研究结果表明,在团队管理的基金结构中,存在潜在的搭便车问题,强有力的董事会监督可以改善基金绩效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Number Two Executives: Bottom-up Monitoring Organization Budgetary Control System Changes in Persistence of Performance Over Time The Resource-Based Paradox of Impact-Oriented Strategies: A Study in the Context of Microcredit A Comprehensive Analysis of Top Indian Cosmetic Company : LAKME
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1