THE PROBLEM OF DETERMINATION OF THE PERSONAL CHARACTER OF TESTATOR’S OBLIGATIONS WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF THEIR INCLUSION IN THE MASS OF THE SUCCESSION

O. Cherepanova
{"title":"THE PROBLEM OF DETERMINATION OF THE PERSONAL CHARACTER OF TESTATOR’S OBLIGATIONS WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF THEIR INCLUSION IN THE MASS OF THE SUCCESSION","authors":"O. Cherepanova","doi":"10.18572/1813-1204-2021-2-29-32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines controversial issues related to the responsibility of the heirs for the obligations of the testator, which have a connection with his personality. The article analyzes the opposing legal positions developed by judicial practice to determine the legal nature of these obligations. The conclusion is substantiated that it is necessary to include in the hereditary mass of obligations to compensate for moral harm and to compensate for harm to life and health, as not having a personal character.","PeriodicalId":214894,"journal":{"name":"Notary","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Notary","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18572/1813-1204-2021-2-29-32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article examines controversial issues related to the responsibility of the heirs for the obligations of the testator, which have a connection with his personality. The article analyzes the opposing legal positions developed by judicial practice to determine the legal nature of these obligations. The conclusion is substantiated that it is necessary to include in the hereditary mass of obligations to compensate for moral harm and to compensate for harm to life and health, as not having a personal character.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定遗嘱人的义务的个人性质的问题,在其纳入的继承质量的框架内
本文探讨了与遗嘱人人格有关的继承人对遗嘱人义务的责任问题。本文分析了司法实践中形成的对立的法律立场,以确定这些义务的法律性质。结论得到证实,有必要将赔偿精神损害和赔偿对生命和健康的损害的遗传义务包括在内,因为这些义务不具有个人性质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Compensation of Damage Caused by the Use of Artificial Intelligence On Contra Legem Interpretation of the Provisions of Inheritance and Family Laws The Unworthy Heir Institution: Civil Law and Criminal Law Aspects The Notarial System in Russia: The Historical Aspect A SAFE Agreement as an Alternative to a Convertible Loan Agreement: Experience of Foreign Countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1