{"title":"An analysis-revision cycle to evolve requirements specifications","authors":"A. Garcez, A. Russo, B. Nuseibeh, J. Kramer","doi":"10.1109/ASE.2001.989828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We argue that the evolution of requirements specifications can be supported by a cycle composed of two phases: analysis and revision. We investigate an instance of such a cycle, which combines two techniques of logical abduction and inductive learning to analyze and revise specifications respectively.","PeriodicalId":433615,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings 16th Annual International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE 2001)","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings 16th Annual International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE 2001)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASE.2001.989828","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22
Abstract
We argue that the evolution of requirements specifications can be supported by a cycle composed of two phases: analysis and revision. We investigate an instance of such a cycle, which combines two techniques of logical abduction and inductive learning to analyze and revise specifications respectively.