Comparison of Two Soil Gas Methods Used during a Field Investigation

T. L. Liikala, J. C. Evans
{"title":"Comparison of Two Soil Gas Methods Used during a Field Investigation","authors":"T. L. Liikala, J. C. Evans","doi":"10.1080/15320389709383571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Soil gas surveys were employed to help determine the nature and extent of contamination resulting from the past operation of source area ST58, the Old Quartermaster Service Station, at Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska. Two Intrusive methods were used for comparison, active conventional gas extraction and the passive Petrex method. Results were comparable, with gasoline identified as the main subsurface contaminant In both surveys. Close spatial correlation was also achieved among screening instruments and laboratory analyses. Contaminant concentrations corresponded very well with unsealed blueprints showing the locations of the above‐ground storage tanks and associated piping, subsequent test pit soil samples, and excavation results. The contamination probably occurred as a result of surface spills and leaks from discontinuities and/or breaks in the underground piping. A finer grid was employed in the Petrex method survey and produced better‐resolved contours. The use of conventional gas extraction provided...","PeriodicalId":433778,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Soil Contamination","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Soil Contamination","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15320389709383571","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Soil gas surveys were employed to help determine the nature and extent of contamination resulting from the past operation of source area ST58, the Old Quartermaster Service Station, at Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska. Two Intrusive methods were used for comparison, active conventional gas extraction and the passive Petrex method. Results were comparable, with gasoline identified as the main subsurface contaminant In both surveys. Close spatial correlation was also achieved among screening instruments and laboratory analyses. Contaminant concentrations corresponded very well with unsealed blueprints showing the locations of the above‐ground storage tanks and associated piping, subsequent test pit soil samples, and excavation results. The contamination probably occurred as a result of surface spills and leaks from discontinuities and/or breaks in the underground piping. A finer grid was employed in the Petrex method survey and produced better‐resolved contours. The use of conventional gas extraction provided...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两种土壤气测法在野外调查中的比较
采用土壤气体调查来帮助确定过去在阿拉斯加艾尔森空军基地的ST58区(旧军需服务站)操作造成的污染的性质和程度。采用两种侵入法进行对比,即主动常规抽气法和被动Petrex法。结果具有可比性,在两次调查中,汽油被确定为主要的地下污染物。筛选仪器和实验室分析之间也实现了密切的空间相关性。污染物浓度与未密封的蓝图非常吻合,蓝图上显示了地上储罐和相关管道的位置、随后的测试坑土壤样本和挖掘结果。污染可能是由于地下管道的不连续性和/或断裂造成的表面泄漏和泄漏造成的。在Petrex方法测量中采用了更精细的网格,并产生了更高分辨率的等高线。使用传统的天然气开采提供了…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bioremediation of Soil Contaminated with Explosives at the Naval Weapons Station Yorktown Settlement Prediction for Municipal Solid Waste Landfills Using Power Creep Law Quantification of Compositional Changes of Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC/FID and GC/MS during a Long-Term Bioremediation Experiment A Method for Assessing Leaching Potential for Petroleum Hydrocarbons Release Sites: Multiphase and Multisubstance Equilibrium Partitioning Monte Carlo Vadose Zone Model for Soil Remedial Criteria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1