Review and performance comparison of VANET protocols: AODV, DSR, OLSR, DYMO, DSDV & ZRP

Tareq Emad Ali, Layth A. Khalil al Dulaimi, Yamaan E. Majeed
{"title":"Review and performance comparison of VANET protocols: AODV, DSR, OLSR, DYMO, DSDV & ZRP","authors":"Tareq Emad Ali, Layth A. Khalil al Dulaimi, Yamaan E. Majeed","doi":"10.1109/AIC-MITCSA.2016.7759934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper a fast review and comparative study of the adhoc routing protocols used in VANET will be presented. The research filed in Vehicular adhoc network (VANET) is developing very fast. An extensive variety of utilizations has been served under various situation (Highway, urban, and Cities). Many protocols have been adopted to serve different topology and scenarios, these protocols faced various challenges. VANETs provide communication between vehicles moving on the roads. The routing protocols in VANET are affected by the vehicle high speed which leads to frequently link breaks between the communicated vehicles, so the adhoc routing protocols are adapted with the VANET characteristics to deliver the data between vehicles in short time. The main goal of VANET is to assemble a data system among vehicles that are moving on the roads, which enables the vehicles to communicate with each other for the safety manners. In this paper, an endeavor has been made to compare six surely understood protocols AODV, DSR, OLSR, DSDV, ZRP and DSDV. Used in VANET from the (packet deliver ratio, end to end delay, throughput, routing algorithm load, received packets, routing packets, dropped packets, ratio of packet loss, Average Jitter) point of view.","PeriodicalId":315179,"journal":{"name":"2016 Al-Sadeq International Conference on Multidisciplinary in IT and Communication Science and Applications (AIC-MITCSA)","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 Al-Sadeq International Conference on Multidisciplinary in IT and Communication Science and Applications (AIC-MITCSA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AIC-MITCSA.2016.7759934","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

In this paper a fast review and comparative study of the adhoc routing protocols used in VANET will be presented. The research filed in Vehicular adhoc network (VANET) is developing very fast. An extensive variety of utilizations has been served under various situation (Highway, urban, and Cities). Many protocols have been adopted to serve different topology and scenarios, these protocols faced various challenges. VANETs provide communication between vehicles moving on the roads. The routing protocols in VANET are affected by the vehicle high speed which leads to frequently link breaks between the communicated vehicles, so the adhoc routing protocols are adapted with the VANET characteristics to deliver the data between vehicles in short time. The main goal of VANET is to assemble a data system among vehicles that are moving on the roads, which enables the vehicles to communicate with each other for the safety manners. In this paper, an endeavor has been made to compare six surely understood protocols AODV, DSR, OLSR, DSDV, ZRP and DSDV. Used in VANET from the (packet deliver ratio, end to end delay, throughput, routing algorithm load, received packets, routing packets, dropped packets, ratio of packet loss, Average Jitter) point of view.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
VANET协议:AODV, DSR, OLSR, DYMO, DSDV和ZRP的审查和性能比较
本文将对VANET中使用的自组织路由协议进行快速回顾和比较研究。车载自组网(VANET)的研究领域正在迅速发展。在各种情况下(高速公路,城市和城市)提供了广泛的各种利用。针对不同的拓扑和场景,采用了许多协议,这些协议面临着各种挑战。vanet为行驶在道路上的车辆提供通信。由于车辆高速行驶导致通信车辆之间链路频繁中断,因此采用了适应VANET特性的自组织路由协议,在短时间内实现车辆间的数据传输。VANET的主要目标是在道路上行驶的车辆之间组装一个数据系统,使车辆之间能够相互通信以获取安全方式。本文对AODV、DSR、OLSR、DSDV、ZRP和DSDV这六种公认的协议进行了比较。用于VANET的从(包发送比、端到端延迟、吞吐量、路由算法负载、接收包、路由包、丢包、丢包比、平均抖动)的角度分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Routing algorithm optimization for software defined network WAN Modeling, design and analysis of an induction heating coil for brazing process using FEM Feature extraction of brain event-related potentials using cubic spline technique Ontology based reasoning for solving passenger train optimization problem Checking the robustness of a PWM sliding mode controlled DC/DC buck-boost converter using its Matlab/Simulink model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1