TRANSITION OFFENSE IN TOP-LEVEL EUROPEAN BASKETBALL

M. Jeličić
{"title":"TRANSITION OFFENSE IN TOP-LEVEL EUROPEAN BASKETBALL","authors":"M. Jeličić","doi":"10.51558/1840-4561.2021.18.2.41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine differences in the use of transition pick and roll/pop and transition\npost-up maneuvers in two top teams from the EuroLeague basketball (first placed and ninth placed teams in the\n2019/2020 season). Methods. The sample of respondents consisted of 56 EuroLeague basketball games played by teams\nAnadolu Efes Istanbul (28) and Zalgiris Kaunas (28), the ANA team and the ZALAG team respectively. Variables for\nestimating transition offenses were collected during EuroLeague senior basketball matches. A total of 16 variables\n(Toff_tot, TP&R/P_tot, TP&R/P_suc, TP&R/P_uns, %suc P&R/P, %uns P&R/P, TP_up_tot, TP_up_suc, P_up_uns, %suc P_up,\n%uns_ P_up, TO, % TO, Toff_point, TP&R/P_point; and Tpup_point) were assessed to estimate transitional offenses in\nteams that use early pick and post-up maneuvers in their performance. Results. Findings showed statistically significant\ndifferences between two analyzed teams in variables as described further in the text. The ANA team performed less TP &\nR/P_tot offenses per game then the ZALG team. Also, when it comes to the total number of transition post-up situations,\nthe ANA performed less of these then the ZALG per game. At the end, the ANA team lost on average less balls than the\nZALG team per game in the Transition offense. Conclusions. Obtained differences that occurred between two analyzed\nbasketball teams cannot fully explain placement of the teams in the table. The main difference comes from the\nphilosophy of the coach and the very concept of the team or individual quality of the players.\nKey words: top European basketball transition offense, transition pick & roll/pop, transition post-up","PeriodicalId":249361,"journal":{"name":"Sport Scientific And Practical Aspects: International Scientific Journal of Kinesiology","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sport Scientific And Practical Aspects: International Scientific Journal of Kinesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51558/1840-4561.2021.18.2.41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine differences in the use of transition pick and roll/pop and transition post-up maneuvers in two top teams from the EuroLeague basketball (first placed and ninth placed teams in the 2019/2020 season). Methods. The sample of respondents consisted of 56 EuroLeague basketball games played by teams Anadolu Efes Istanbul (28) and Zalgiris Kaunas (28), the ANA team and the ZALAG team respectively. Variables for estimating transition offenses were collected during EuroLeague senior basketball matches. A total of 16 variables (Toff_tot, TP&R/P_tot, TP&R/P_suc, TP&R/P_uns, %suc P&R/P, %uns P&R/P, TP_up_tot, TP_up_suc, P_up_uns, %suc P_up, %uns_ P_up, TO, % TO, Toff_point, TP&R/P_point; and Tpup_point) were assessed to estimate transitional offenses in teams that use early pick and post-up maneuvers in their performance. Results. Findings showed statistically significant differences between two analyzed teams in variables as described further in the text. The ANA team performed less TP & R/P_tot offenses per game then the ZALG team. Also, when it comes to the total number of transition post-up situations, the ANA performed less of these then the ZALG per game. At the end, the ANA team lost on average less balls than the ZALG team per game in the Transition offense. Conclusions. Obtained differences that occurred between two analyzed basketball teams cannot fully explain placement of the teams in the table. The main difference comes from the philosophy of the coach and the very concept of the team or individual quality of the players. Key words: top European basketball transition offense, transition pick & roll/pop, transition post-up
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲顶级篮球的过渡进攻
目的:本研究的目的是确定两支欧洲篮球联赛顶级球队(2019/2020赛季排名第一和第九的球队)在转换挡拆/跳投和转换后置战术使用上的差异。方法。受访者的样本包括56场欧洲联赛篮球比赛,分别是ANA队和Zalgiris考纳斯队(28场)和伊斯坦布尔的sanadolu Efes队。在欧洲篮球联赛中收集了预测转换进攻的变量。共有16个变量(Toff_tot, TP&R/P_tot, TP&R/P_suc, TP&R/P_uns, %suc P&R/P, %uns P&R/P, TP_up_tot, TP_up_suc, P_up_uns, %suc P_up,%uns_ P_up, TO, % TO, Toff_point, TP&R/P_point;和Tpup_point)被评估来评估在他们的表现中使用早期捡球和后置战术的过渡进攻球队。结果。研究结果显示,在文本中进一步描述的变量中,两个分析团队之间存在统计学上的显著差异。ANA队每场比赛的TP &R/P_tot进攻比ZALG队少。此外,当涉及到转换后投篮的总次数时,ANA每场比赛的表现比ZALG要少。最后,在转换进攻中,ANA队场均丢球比zalg队少。结论。所获得的两支被分析篮球队之间的差异并不能完全解释两支球队在排名表中的位置。主要的区别来自于教练的执教理念,以及对球队和球员个人素质的重视。关键词:欧洲顶级篮球转换进攻,转换挡拆/跳投,转换背投
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF DIFFERENCES IN EXHIBITING FLEXIBILITY INYOUNG FOOTBALL PLAYERS AND KARATE PRACTITIONERS (KARATEKA) THE RELATIONSHIP OF MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF THE TECHNIQUE OF THROWING WITH THE STANDING LEG LEFT FROM THE BACK THE EFFECTS OF PROGRAMMED WORK ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF SPECIFIC MOTOR SKILLS IN YOUNG FOOTBALL PLAYERS ASSESSMENT OF FOOT DEFORMITY IN PRE-SCHOOL CHILDREN IN "ALADIN" KINDERGARTEN TUZLA DIFFERENCES IN THE SOMATIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SUCCESSFUL AND LESS SUCCESSFUL GROUPS OF BASKETBALL PLAYERS OF CADET AGE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1