Ranking of Challenges of Accreditation Standards Implementation in Public and private Hospitals: A comparative approach

Mojgan Zarifraftar
{"title":"Ranking of Challenges of Accreditation Standards Implementation in Public and private Hospitals: A comparative approach","authors":"Mojgan Zarifraftar","doi":"10.24200/jmas.vol6iss03pp45-54","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The study aimed to ranking the challenges of accreditation standards implementation in private and public hospitals. Methodology: The method of data collection was descriptive research of field studies branch. Statistical population included the managing director, manager, matron and head of Quality Control (accreditation) of public and private hospital of Tehran. For collecting data, a questionnaire was designed in 39 items based on reviewing of literature and previous scale. Content and face validity of this questionnaire was considered and confirmed in separately stages; also, reliability of this questionnaire investigated through Cronbach’s alpha and for whole dimensions were higher than 0.7.  In final, for data analysis and testing assumptions, exploratory factor analysis and Friedman test has been administered by using SPSS-20. Results: result of exploratory factor analysis showed that challenges of accreditation standard implementation were classified in 9 aspects and explained 72.4% variance of this variable. These 9 factors in order to priority are encouraging drivers; perception of accreditation standards; financial resources; quality improvement; management knowledge, skills and commitment; support of regulatory initiatives; standard & surveying development; human resources and determining macro policies and procedures. Also finding showed that there are differences between the ranking of these challenges in public and private hospitals. Conclusion:  the results of the study showed that the challenges which have the highest rank are ones of the main obstacles of implementation of accreditation in hospitals and more attention should be given to them.","PeriodicalId":370173,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management and Accounting Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Management and Accounting Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24200/jmas.vol6iss03pp45-54","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objective: The study aimed to ranking the challenges of accreditation standards implementation in private and public hospitals. Methodology: The method of data collection was descriptive research of field studies branch. Statistical population included the managing director, manager, matron and head of Quality Control (accreditation) of public and private hospital of Tehran. For collecting data, a questionnaire was designed in 39 items based on reviewing of literature and previous scale. Content and face validity of this questionnaire was considered and confirmed in separately stages; also, reliability of this questionnaire investigated through Cronbach’s alpha and for whole dimensions were higher than 0.7.  In final, for data analysis and testing assumptions, exploratory factor analysis and Friedman test has been administered by using SPSS-20. Results: result of exploratory factor analysis showed that challenges of accreditation standard implementation were classified in 9 aspects and explained 72.4% variance of this variable. These 9 factors in order to priority are encouraging drivers; perception of accreditation standards; financial resources; quality improvement; management knowledge, skills and commitment; support of regulatory initiatives; standard & surveying development; human resources and determining macro policies and procedures. Also finding showed that there are differences between the ranking of these challenges in public and private hospitals. Conclusion:  the results of the study showed that the challenges which have the highest rank are ones of the main obstacles of implementation of accreditation in hospitals and more attention should be given to them.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公立和私立医院认证标准实施挑战排名:比较方法
目的:本研究旨在对私立和公立医院实施认证标准所面临的挑战进行排名。方法:资料收集方法为田野调查分支描述性研究。统计人口包括德黑兰公立和私立医院的常务董事、经理、护士长和质量控制(认证)负责人。为了收集数据,在查阅文献和以往量表的基础上设计了一份包含39个条目的问卷。本问卷的内容和面效度是分阶段考虑和确定的;通过Cronbach’s alpha量表和各维度的信度均大于0.7。最后,在数据分析和假设检验方面,采用SPSS-20进行探索性因子分析和Friedman检验。结果:探索性因子分析结果显示,认可标准执行的挑战分为9个方面,解释了该变量72.4%的方差。这9个因素依次为:激励驱动因素;对认可标准的认识;金融资源;质量改进;管理知识、技能和承诺;支持监管措施;标准与测量发展;人力资源和确定宏观政策和程序。调查结果还表明,公立医院和私立医院在这些挑战的排名上存在差异。结论:研究结果表明,排名最高的挑战是医院实施认证的主要障碍之一,应引起重视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Validity of Altman’s Models in Predicting Iraqi Private-Banks Soundness The Role of Leaders’ Moral Intelligence to Enhance Strategic Leadership Investigating the relationship between cross-sectional free cash flows, dividends and corporate value Investigation the Factors that Affect Intention to Use Informational Technology among Payame Noor University Students (English Language) at Fars Province Investigating the relationship between management forecasting of profits and management incentives with managers' risk-taking in companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1