Analysis of the First Page of 2,236 Medical Records with Writing Defects and Relevant Countermeasures

Daqiao Zhu, Wenjun Zhang, Lijiang Yong, Shaoyong Huang
{"title":"Analysis of the First Page of 2,236 Medical Records with Writing Defects and Relevant Countermeasures","authors":"Daqiao Zhu, Wenjun Zhang, Lijiang Yong, Shaoyong Huang","doi":"10.3109/23256176.2014.932073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractObjective. To analyze the writing defects in the first page of medical records and propose improvement measures. Methods. The Quality Examination Score Scale of First Page of Medical Records was developed according to the requirements of the Instructions for Filling Some Items on the First Page of Medical Records issued by the former Ministry of Health; the medical records from January to February 2014 of our hospital were randomly sampled; 2,236 records were obtained and the completeness of the first page of each record was analyzed. Results. The proportion of the medical records with no defects in the first page was 49.41% (1,105/2,236); the defect rate was 50.58% (1,131/2,236); the qualified rate of the first page of the medical records was 94.49% (2,113/2,236); and the unqualified rate was 5.50% (123/2,236); there were many problems in the first page of medical records such as incompleteness, mistakes, and non-standard writing. Conclusion. The problem of poor quality in the first page of medic...","PeriodicalId":163748,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Medical Record English Edition","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Medical Record English Edition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/23256176.2014.932073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

AbstractObjective. To analyze the writing defects in the first page of medical records and propose improvement measures. Methods. The Quality Examination Score Scale of First Page of Medical Records was developed according to the requirements of the Instructions for Filling Some Items on the First Page of Medical Records issued by the former Ministry of Health; the medical records from January to February 2014 of our hospital were randomly sampled; 2,236 records were obtained and the completeness of the first page of each record was analyzed. Results. The proportion of the medical records with no defects in the first page was 49.41% (1,105/2,236); the defect rate was 50.58% (1,131/2,236); the qualified rate of the first page of the medical records was 94.49% (2,113/2,236); and the unqualified rate was 5.50% (123/2,236); there were many problems in the first page of medical records such as incompleteness, mistakes, and non-standard writing. Conclusion. The problem of poor quality in the first page of medic...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2236份病案首页书写缺陷分析及对策
AbstractObjective。分析病案首页的书写缺陷,提出改进措施。方法。《病案首页质量检查分值表》是根据原卫生部《病案首页部分填表须知》的要求制定的;随机抽取我院2014年1 - 2月的病历;获得了2236条记录,并分析了每条记录第一页的完整性。结果。病历首页无缺陷的比例为49.41% (1,105/2,236);不良率为50.58% (1,131/2,236);病案首页合格率为94.49% (2,113/2,236);不合格率为5.50% (123/ 2236);病案首页存在着不完整、错误、书写不规范等问题。结论。医学报告第一页的质量问题…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Discussion on the Method of Classifi cation of Medical Syndromes in the ICD-10 Evaluation of the Effect of Implementation of Clinical Pathway in a 3A Hospital in Shenzhen Error Analysis and Discussion on ICD-9-CM-3 Coding of 216 Percutaneous Coronary Interventions A Discussion on ICD-10 Coding of Infantile Diarrheal Disease Predictive Analysis of Outpatient Volumes of a First-class Grade A General Hospital through ARIMA Models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1