Technical Report: The Business Case for Healthcare Information Technology in Nursing Homes

L. Hitt, Prasanna Tambe
{"title":"Technical Report: The Business Case for Healthcare Information Technology in Nursing Homes","authors":"L. Hitt, Prasanna Tambe","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1964841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We investigate whether the implementation of electronic medical records is associated with higher levels of economic performance in nursing homes in terms of quality, profitability, cost, productivity, and efficiency. Our analysis is based on a survey of Healthcare Information Technology (HIT) usage for approximately 200 New York State Nursing Homes, including 26 that participated in the NY Nursing Home Demonstration project. The survey data are combined with regulatory data from CMS Nursing Home Compare and the NY State RHCF-4 financial reports. The analysis uses a “difference in differences approach” comparing changes in economic performance in a facility before and after HIT implementation to changes over the same time periods in other facilities that are known to not have implemented HIT. Overall, we do not find conclusive evidence that adoption of HIT raises productivity, increases commonly used performance measures, or improves quality scores in the short run. There is some evidence of a positive effect after several years. We do find that there appears to be a slight increase (1-3%) in variable costs, but also slightly greater efficiency when measured by frontier analysis. However, facilities that adopt HIT and either adopt or have in place progressive work practices (which include greater staff autonomy, cooperative labor-management relations, and greater teamwork) consistently show performance gains. Firms that are one standard deviation higher on our progressive work practice score get a 2-3% increase in productivity, a 2-3% reduction in costs and a 1-2% incremental efficiency gain upon adoption of HIT relative to their peers.Our results suggest that adoption of EMR can have significant positive economic benefits when implemented in conjunction with progressive work practices.","PeriodicalId":230649,"journal":{"name":"Health Care Law & Policy eJournal","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Care Law & Policy eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1964841","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

We investigate whether the implementation of electronic medical records is associated with higher levels of economic performance in nursing homes in terms of quality, profitability, cost, productivity, and efficiency. Our analysis is based on a survey of Healthcare Information Technology (HIT) usage for approximately 200 New York State Nursing Homes, including 26 that participated in the NY Nursing Home Demonstration project. The survey data are combined with regulatory data from CMS Nursing Home Compare and the NY State RHCF-4 financial reports. The analysis uses a “difference in differences approach” comparing changes in economic performance in a facility before and after HIT implementation to changes over the same time periods in other facilities that are known to not have implemented HIT. Overall, we do not find conclusive evidence that adoption of HIT raises productivity, increases commonly used performance measures, or improves quality scores in the short run. There is some evidence of a positive effect after several years. We do find that there appears to be a slight increase (1-3%) in variable costs, but also slightly greater efficiency when measured by frontier analysis. However, facilities that adopt HIT and either adopt or have in place progressive work practices (which include greater staff autonomy, cooperative labor-management relations, and greater teamwork) consistently show performance gains. Firms that are one standard deviation higher on our progressive work practice score get a 2-3% increase in productivity, a 2-3% reduction in costs and a 1-2% incremental efficiency gain upon adoption of HIT relative to their peers.Our results suggest that adoption of EMR can have significant positive economic benefits when implemented in conjunction with progressive work practices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
技术报告:养老院医疗保健信息技术的商业案例
我们调查电子医疗记录的实施是否与养老院在质量、盈利能力、成本、生产力和效率方面的更高水平的经济表现有关。我们的分析基于对大约200家纽约州养老院的医疗保健信息技术(HIT)使用情况的调查,其中包括26家参加了纽约养老院示范项目。调查数据与CMS养老院比较的监管数据和纽约州RHCF-4财务报告相结合。该分析使用了“差异中的差异”方法,将实施HIT前后设施的经济绩效变化与其他已知未实施HIT的设施在同一时间段内的变化进行比较。总的来说,我们没有找到确凿的证据表明采用HIT可以提高生产力,增加常用的绩效指标,或者在短期内提高质量分数。有一些证据表明,几年后会产生积极的影响。我们确实发现,可变成本似乎略有增加(1-3%),但通过前沿分析衡量时,效率也略有提高。然而,采用HIT并采用或采用先进的工作实践(包括更大的员工自主权、合作的劳资关系和更大的团队合作)的设施始终显示出绩效的提高。在我们的渐进式工作实践得分上高出一个标准差的公司,在采用HIT后,相对于同行,生产率提高了2-3%,成本降低了2-3%,效率增加了1-2%。我们的研究结果表明,电子病历的采用与先进的工作实践相结合,可以产生显著的积极经济效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Role of Law in End-of-Life Decision-Making: Perspectives of Patients, Substitute Decision-Makers and Families Phasing Out Certificate-of-Need Laws: A Menu of Options Prospect Patents, Data Markets and the Commons in Data Driven Medicine. Openness and the Political Economy of Intellectual Property Rights Grandma Got Run Over by the Doctor: An Examination of the End of Life Choice Bill with Reference to the German Approach Credit, Default, and Optimal Health Insurance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1