Comparison of California Bearing Ratio (CBR) Value Based on Cone Penetration Test (CPT) and Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP)

Reki Arbianto, Teguh Yuono, G. Gunarso
{"title":"Comparison of California Bearing Ratio (CBR) Value Based on Cone Penetration Test (CPT) and Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP)","authors":"Reki Arbianto, Teguh Yuono, G. Gunarso","doi":"10.30659/jacee.4.2.70-78","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In civil engineering, land is important because as a place for building infrastructure to be built, so that the building infrastructure on it is stable, adequate carrying capacity is needed. The amount of soil bearing capacity can be determined in several ways, including the California Bearing Ratio (CBR) Field Test, Cone Penetration Test (CPT) and Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP). The CBR and DCP tests are often used to determine the level of surface soil density on road structures, while CPT is usually used to determine the hard soil layer on the building structure. However, in certain situations Sondir and DCP data are often used to predict the CBR value, because the test is quite practical and efficient compared to the CBR test. CBR testing requires heavy equipment which in most small-scale projects is not available. In this study, we compared the CBR value based on the data obtained from the Sondir and DCP tests. Data collection was carried out in Surakarta and its surroundings. Based on the test results, the CBR value generated from the DCP test tends to be smaller than that from the CPT test with a ratio of 0.62: 1. This study resulted in the relationship between CBR values from the results of the CPT and DCP tests shown in the following equation: CBR (DCP) % = 0.2552 CBR(CPT) + 2.6306 and CBR (DCP) % = 0.617 CBR(CPT).","PeriodicalId":349112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Civil and Environmental Engineering","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Civil and Environmental Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30659/jacee.4.2.70-78","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In civil engineering, land is important because as a place for building infrastructure to be built, so that the building infrastructure on it is stable, adequate carrying capacity is needed. The amount of soil bearing capacity can be determined in several ways, including the California Bearing Ratio (CBR) Field Test, Cone Penetration Test (CPT) and Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP). The CBR and DCP tests are often used to determine the level of surface soil density on road structures, while CPT is usually used to determine the hard soil layer on the building structure. However, in certain situations Sondir and DCP data are often used to predict the CBR value, because the test is quite practical and efficient compared to the CBR test. CBR testing requires heavy equipment which in most small-scale projects is not available. In this study, we compared the CBR value based on the data obtained from the Sondir and DCP tests. Data collection was carried out in Surakarta and its surroundings. Based on the test results, the CBR value generated from the DCP test tends to be smaller than that from the CPT test with a ratio of 0.62: 1. This study resulted in the relationship between CBR values from the results of the CPT and DCP tests shown in the following equation: CBR (DCP) % = 0.2552 CBR(CPT) + 2.6306 and CBR (DCP) % = 0.617 CBR(CPT).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于锥贯入试验(CPT)和动态锥贯入仪(DCP)的加利福利亚承载比(CBR)值比较
在土木工程中,土地是很重要的,因为作为建设基础设施的场所,为了使其上的建筑基础设施稳定,需要有足够的承载能力。土壤承载力的确定可以通过几种方法进行,包括加州承载比(CBR)现场试验、锥贯入试验(CPT)和动态锥贯入仪(DCP)。CBR和DCP试验通常用于确定道路结构表面土密度水平,而CPT试验通常用于确定建筑结构上的硬土层。然而,在某些情况下,通常使用Sondir和DCP数据来预测CBR值,因为与CBR测试相比,该测试非常实用和有效。CBR测试需要重型设备,这在大多数小型项目中是不可用的。在本研究中,我们比较了基于Sondir和DCP试验获得的数据的CBR值。数据收集工作在泗水市及其周边地区进行。从测试结果来看,DCP测试得到的CBR值比CPT测试得到的CBR值要小,两者的比值为0.62:1。本研究得出CPT和DCP试验结果的CBR值之间的关系如下:CBR(DCP) % = 0.2552 CBR(CPT) + 2.6306和CBR(DCP) % = 0.617 CBR(CPT)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
A refutational approach to geometry theorem proving
IF 5.1 2区 计算机科学Artificial IntelligencePub Date : 1988-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/0004-3702(88)90050-1
Deepak Kapur
A Theorem-Proving Approach to Database Integrity
IF 0 Foundations of Deductive Databases and Logic Programming.Pub Date : 1988-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-934613-40-8.50013-0
F. Sadri, R. Kowalski
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of Polypropylene Fibre on Self- Compacting High-performance Concrete Optimization of Technical Calculation of Precast Wall Application for Kawo Secondary Canal Improvement in Sempor Irrigation Area, Kebumen, Central Java Comparative Analysis of Set-Back Field Jumps In Multi-Storey Building Structures Due To Earthquake Load Numerical Simulation of the Effect of Variation in Subgrade CBR Values on Rigid Pavement Technical Properties of Normal Concrete with Alum Additive
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1