Post-contingency equilibrium analysis techniques for power systems

R. Yeu, W. Sauer
{"title":"Post-contingency equilibrium analysis techniques for power systems","authors":"R. Yeu, W. Sauer","doi":"10.1109/NAPS.2005.1560548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Different methods of calculating the post-contingency equilibrium state of a power system are presented and tested. One method utilizes a full Newton's method, and two utilize a standard commercial power flow program. These three methods are illustrated on two small test systems. The results from these simulations are then compared to a dynamic simulation using numerical integration to an equilibrium state, and conventional contingency analysis using only a standard power flow solution.","PeriodicalId":101495,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 37th Annual North American Power Symposium, 2005.","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 37th Annual North American Power Symposium, 2005.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NAPS.2005.1560548","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Different methods of calculating the post-contingency equilibrium state of a power system are presented and tested. One method utilizes a full Newton's method, and two utilize a standard commercial power flow program. These three methods are illustrated on two small test systems. The results from these simulations are then compared to a dynamic simulation using numerical integration to an equilibrium state, and conventional contingency analysis using only a standard power flow solution.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电力系统事后平衡分析技术
提出并测试了计算电力系统事故后平衡状态的不同方法。一种方法使用完整的牛顿方法,另一种方法使用标准的商业潮流程序。在两个小型测试系统上对这三种方法进行了说明。然后将这些模拟的结果与使用平衡状态数值积分的动态模拟和仅使用标准潮流解的常规偶然性分析进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Linear complexity search algorithm to locate shunt and series compensation for enhancing voltage stability Economic assessment of distributed generation using life cycle costs and environmental externalities PRA for vulnerability assessment of power system infrastructure security Feasibility study of a high-voltage DC & AC multi-circuit hybrid transmission line A V-I slope-based method for flicker source detection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1