The Proposed Duty to Inquire as Affected by Recent Criminal Law Decisions in the United States Supreme Court

Richard G. Singer
{"title":"The Proposed Duty to Inquire as Affected by Recent Criminal Law Decisions in the United States Supreme Court","authors":"Richard G. Singer","doi":"10.1525/NCLR.2000.3.2.701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the past several years, Andrew Ashworth and Andrew von Hirsch and Douglas Husak have urged, as a more refined notion of desert liability in cases otherwise characterized as involving mistake (or ignorance) of law, a “duty of citizen inquiry.” von Hirsch and Husak’s proposal is actually part of a larger endorsement of ignorantia lexis as an excuse. They would not hold liable persons who (1) did not intend to injure a person, and (2) were reasonably unaware of, or mistaken as to, the extent of the law making their conduct illegal. Although their primary focus is on the first prong","PeriodicalId":344882,"journal":{"name":"Buffalo Criminal Law Review","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Buffalo Criminal Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/NCLR.2000.3.2.701","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In the past several years, Andrew Ashworth and Andrew von Hirsch and Douglas Husak have urged, as a more refined notion of desert liability in cases otherwise characterized as involving mistake (or ignorance) of law, a “duty of citizen inquiry.” von Hirsch and Husak’s proposal is actually part of a larger endorsement of ignorantia lexis as an excuse. They would not hold liable persons who (1) did not intend to injure a person, and (2) were reasonably unaware of, or mistaken as to, the extent of the law making their conduct illegal. Although their primary focus is on the first prong
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
受美国最高法院最近刑法判决影响的拟议调查义务
在过去的几年里,安德鲁·阿什沃斯、安德鲁·冯·赫希和道格拉斯·胡萨克曾敦促“公民调查的义务”,作为一种更精确的概念,在那些被描述为涉及法律错误(或无知)的案件中,免责责任。冯·赫希和胡萨克的提议实际上是对无知词汇作为借口的更大支持的一部分。他们不会追究以下人的责任:(1)无意伤害他人,以及(2)合理地不知道或错误地认识到法律规定其行为为非法的程度。尽管他们主要关注的是第一个方面
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Murder After the Merger: A Commentary on Finkelstein Group Violence and Group Vengeance: Toward a Retributivist Theory of International Criminal Law Benthamite Reflections on Codification of the General Principles of Criminal Liability: Towards the Panopticon The Politics of Grace: On the Moral Justification of Executive Clemency Toward a Better Categorical Balance of the Costs and Benefits of the Exclusionary Rule
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1