Contrasting the medical-device and aerospace-industries approach to reliability

D. D. Bell
{"title":"Contrasting the medical-device and aerospace-industries approach to reliability","authors":"D. D. Bell","doi":"10.1109/RAMS.1995.513234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A comparison is made between the defense driven aerospace industry and the medical device industry with respect to their approach to achieving reliability. The Department of Defense establishment has driven the aerospace industry to consider and analyze reliability through imposing a complex set of standards and specifications that control all aspects of design and analysis. The medical device industry, driven by market forces, safety considerations, and limited government regulation, has typically lagged in the imposition of specific reliability requirements and performance of reliability analyses in the design and development process. This situation is changing, the Department of Defense is adopting more and more commercial standards and the medical device industry is responding to a marketplace that is becoming more demanding, where commercial standards and specifications are becoming more widely imposed, and where the Federal, state, and local governments are becoming more active in exerting influence on the industry. The net result is an increasing similarity in the approach taken by of the aerospace and medical device industries towards achieving reliability.","PeriodicalId":143102,"journal":{"name":"Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium 1995 Proceedings","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium 1995 Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS.1995.513234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

A comparison is made between the defense driven aerospace industry and the medical device industry with respect to their approach to achieving reliability. The Department of Defense establishment has driven the aerospace industry to consider and analyze reliability through imposing a complex set of standards and specifications that control all aspects of design and analysis. The medical device industry, driven by market forces, safety considerations, and limited government regulation, has typically lagged in the imposition of specific reliability requirements and performance of reliability analyses in the design and development process. This situation is changing, the Department of Defense is adopting more and more commercial standards and the medical device industry is responding to a marketplace that is becoming more demanding, where commercial standards and specifications are becoming more widely imposed, and where the Federal, state, and local governments are becoming more active in exerting influence on the industry. The net result is an increasing similarity in the approach taken by of the aerospace and medical device industries towards achieving reliability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对比医疗设备和航空航天工业的可靠性方法
比较国防驱动的航空航天工业和医疗设备工业之间的方法,以实现可靠性。美国国防部通过实施一套复杂的标准和规范来控制设计和分析的各个方面,推动航空航天工业考虑和分析可靠性。在市场力量、安全考虑和有限的政府监管的推动下,医疗器械行业在设计和开发过程中实施具体的可靠性要求和可靠性分析方面通常落后。这种情况正在发生变化,国防部正在采用越来越多的商业标准,医疗设备行业正在响应越来越苛刻的市场,商业标准和规范越来越广泛地实施,联邦、州和地方政府也越来越积极地对行业施加影响。最终结果是,航空航天和医疗设备行业为实现可靠性所采取的方法越来越相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of hardware and software faults on ARQ schemes-an experimental study A verification tool to measure software in critical systems Understanding and solving the real reliability assurance problems Applying fuzzy cognitive-maps knowledge-representation to failure modes effects analysis Mass-transit system service quality: tradeoff analysis on reliability, maintainability and logistics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1