Is there A Relationship between Coping Styles and the OptimismPessimism Dimension during the Covid 19 Isolation Period?

D. Pantazi
{"title":"Is there A Relationship between Coping Styles and the OptimismPessimism Dimension during the Covid 19 Isolation Period?","authors":"D. Pantazi","doi":"10.47363/jmscm/2022(1)101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Present research analyzed the relationship between the optimism-pessimism dimension and the coping strategies used in the Covid isolation period, from March to June 2020. Study participants reported higher levels of optimism, compared to pessimism. More optimistic people mostly used problem-oriented coping styles, the most common one being active coping and planning, while more pessimistic people used emotion-oriented ones, the most common one being seeking social-emotional support and emotional discharge. These associations did not show significant differences depending on variables like civil status, living conditions, gender, dependent children, and area of living, indicating either the degree of compliance with the measures imposed by the authorities or the confusion induced by the unique characteristics of the Covid situation. Intriguingly, despite initial assumptions attributing superior adaptive characteristics to men and young people, those who showed a better understanding of the situation were participants around the age of 45, without clear differences between genders, while demographic variables had little or no influence on behaviors during the Covid isolation period. Most of the participants seemed to be in continuous search, being unable to find more adequate personal management strategies in this entire period.","PeriodicalId":408979,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marketing & Supply Chain Management","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marketing & Supply Chain Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47363/jmscm/2022(1)101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Present research analyzed the relationship between the optimism-pessimism dimension and the coping strategies used in the Covid isolation period, from March to June 2020. Study participants reported higher levels of optimism, compared to pessimism. More optimistic people mostly used problem-oriented coping styles, the most common one being active coping and planning, while more pessimistic people used emotion-oriented ones, the most common one being seeking social-emotional support and emotional discharge. These associations did not show significant differences depending on variables like civil status, living conditions, gender, dependent children, and area of living, indicating either the degree of compliance with the measures imposed by the authorities or the confusion induced by the unique characteristics of the Covid situation. Intriguingly, despite initial assumptions attributing superior adaptive characteristics to men and young people, those who showed a better understanding of the situation were participants around the age of 45, without clear differences between genders, while demographic variables had little or no influence on behaviors during the Covid isolation period. Most of the participants seemed to be in continuous search, being unable to find more adequate personal management strategies in this entire period.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Covid - 19隔离期间应对方式与乐观-悲观维度之间是否存在关系?
本研究分析了乐观-悲观维度与2020年3月至6月新冠隔离期间应对策略之间的关系。与悲观相比,研究参与者的乐观程度更高。比较乐观的人多采用问题导向的应对方式,最常见的是积极应对和计划;比较悲观的人多采用情绪导向的应对方式,最常见的是寻求社会情感支持和情绪释放。根据公民身份、生活条件、性别、受抚养子女和居住地区等变量,这些关联没有显示出显著差异,这表明要么是对当局实施的措施的遵守程度,要么是新冠肺炎疫情的独特特征引起的混乱。有趣的是,尽管最初的假设将优越的适应特征归因于男性和年轻人,但那些对情况有更好理解的人是45岁左右的参与者,性别之间没有明显差异,而人口变量对Covid隔离期间的行为影响很小或没有影响。大多数参与者似乎都在不断地寻找,在整个过程中都找不到更合适的个人管理策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The State of Technology Innovation in Nigeria: Trends, Challenges and Opportunities Measuring Online Customer Satisfaction Based on Customer Reviews: Topic Modeling Method Using Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) Algorithm Implementing a VDA-Triggered Compliance System in Fleet Management: A Novel Approach Enhancing Fleet Management: A Novel Approach to Vehicle-Device Association using Mobile Administration Investigating the Supply Chain Logistic Issues for SMEs Service Quality in Pakistan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1