A Faction of One: Revisiting Madison's Notes on the Constitutional Convention

Gerard N. Magliocca
{"title":"A Faction of One: Revisiting Madison's Notes on the Constitutional Convention","authors":"Gerard N. Magliocca","doi":"10.1111/lsi.12296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This essay on <i>Madison's Hand: Revising the Constitutional Convention</i>, Mary Bilder's revisionist account (2016) of James Madison's <i>Notes</i> on the Constitutional Convention argues that her central thesis, which is that Madison substantially revised the <i>Notes</i> long after the Convention adjourned, is groundbreaking but will have no effect on constitutional law. <i>Madison's Hand</i> is groundbreaking because the book yields many powerful insights into the deliberations of the Convention and into the evolution of Madison's thought. Nevertheless, constitutional practice in the Supreme Court and among elite lawyers is so divorced from the <i>Notes</i> that even a dramatic shift in their interpretation will not disturb the evolution of judicial doctrine applying the text written in 1787.</p>","PeriodicalId":47418,"journal":{"name":"Law and Social Inquiry-Journal of the American Bar Foundation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/lsi.12296","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law and Social Inquiry-Journal of the American Bar Foundation","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lsi.12296","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This essay on Madison's Hand: Revising the Constitutional Convention, Mary Bilder's revisionist account (2016) of James Madison's Notes on the Constitutional Convention argues that her central thesis, which is that Madison substantially revised the Notes long after the Convention adjourned, is groundbreaking but will have no effect on constitutional law. Madison's Hand is groundbreaking because the book yields many powerful insights into the deliberations of the Convention and into the evolution of Madison's thought. Nevertheless, constitutional practice in the Supreme Court and among elite lawyers is so divorced from the Notes that even a dramatic shift in their interpretation will not disturb the evolution of judicial doctrine applying the text written in 1787.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一个派系:重新审视麦迪逊关于制宪会议的笔记
这篇关于麦迪逊的手:修改宪法会议的文章,玛丽·比尔德(Mary Bilder)对詹姆斯·麦迪逊的《制宪会议笔记》的修正主义解释(2016)认为,她的中心论点,即麦迪逊在会议休会很久之后大幅修改了《制宪会议笔记》,是开创性的,但对宪法没有影响。《麦迪逊之手》具有开创性,因为这本书对制宪会议的审议和麦迪逊思想的演变提供了许多强有力的见解。然而,最高法院和精英律师的宪法实践与《注释》是如此的脱节,以至于即使他们对《注释》的解释发生了戏剧性的变化,也不会影响应用1787年撰写的文本的司法理论的演变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊最新文献
Mercy and the Construction of Social Control: A Four-Site Analysis of Clemency Exclusion from Within: Noncitizens and the Rise of Discriminatory Licensing Laws Legal Strategies at the Governance Precipice: Transnational Lawyers in the European Union’s Sovereign Debt Crisis (2010–2012) Aspirational Laws in Action: A Field Experiment Many Shades of Success: Bottom-up Indicators of Individual Success in Community Courts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1