Evaluation of Fine-needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) Sensitivity Compared to PCR for Diagnosing Tuberculosis Lymphadenitis

O. Mustafa, Ebtehal Mohamed, A. Omer, Abdelmonem Mohamed, Sheima Abdemagid, Alaa I. Ali, N. Hassan, M. Khalil, Nagia Suliman
{"title":"Evaluation of Fine-needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) Sensitivity Compared to PCR for Diagnosing Tuberculosis Lymphadenitis","authors":"O. Mustafa, Ebtehal Mohamed, A. Omer, Abdelmonem Mohamed, Sheima Abdemagid, Alaa I. Ali, N. Hassan, M. Khalil, Nagia Suliman","doi":"10.18502/sjms.v17i3.12103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Tuberculosis (TB) is a major healthcare burden in Sudan and other developing countries, it is considered the second most common cause of death from infectious diseases after those due to AIDS. In Sudan, TB lymphadenitis (TBLA) remains one of the major health problems. This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted at the University of Medical Sciences and Technology (UMST) and Total Labcare Diagnostic Center (TDC). The study aims to compare the sensitivity of Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) smears with that of the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) for the diagnosis of TBLA. \nMaterials and Methods: Fifty-five dry smears were obtained using fine-needle aspiration (FNA) from an enlarged lymph node. PCR was applied to detect the target gene (IS6110). May-Grunwald-Giemsa (MGG) or Diff quick stains were used. \nResults: Two (4%) patients with TBLA were non-necrotic, while fifty-three of them (96%) were necrotic. Moreover, 17 (30%) fine-needle lymph node aspiration specimens were confirmed by PCR to be positive for Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTB complex) while 38 (70%) of them were negative. \nConclusion: There was no significant difference between the sensitivity of PCR and that of FNAC (P-value = 0.33).","PeriodicalId":132580,"journal":{"name":"Sudan journal of medical sciences","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sudan journal of medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/sjms.v17i3.12103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Tuberculosis (TB) is a major healthcare burden in Sudan and other developing countries, it is considered the second most common cause of death from infectious diseases after those due to AIDS. In Sudan, TB lymphadenitis (TBLA) remains one of the major health problems. This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted at the University of Medical Sciences and Technology (UMST) and Total Labcare Diagnostic Center (TDC). The study aims to compare the sensitivity of Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) smears with that of the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) for the diagnosis of TBLA. Materials and Methods: Fifty-five dry smears were obtained using fine-needle aspiration (FNA) from an enlarged lymph node. PCR was applied to detect the target gene (IS6110). May-Grunwald-Giemsa (MGG) or Diff quick stains were used. Results: Two (4%) patients with TBLA were non-necrotic, while fifty-three of them (96%) were necrotic. Moreover, 17 (30%) fine-needle lymph node aspiration specimens were confirmed by PCR to be positive for Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTB complex) while 38 (70%) of them were negative. Conclusion: There was no significant difference between the sensitivity of PCR and that of FNAC (P-value = 0.33).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
细针穿刺细胞学(FNAC)与PCR诊断结核性淋巴结炎的敏感性比较
背景:结核病(TB)是苏丹和其他发展中国家的主要医疗负担,它被认为是仅次于艾滋病的第二大传染病死亡原因。在苏丹,结核性淋巴结炎(TBLA)仍然是主要的卫生问题之一。这项描述性横断面研究是在医学科技大学(UMST)和Total Labcare诊断中心(TDC)进行的。本研究旨在比较细针吸细胞学(FNAC)涂片与聚合酶链反应(PCR)诊断TBLA的敏感性。材料和方法:采用细针抽吸法(FNA)从肿大的淋巴结上获得55张干涂片。采用PCR方法检测目的基因IS6110。使用May-Grunwald-Giemsa (MGG)或Diff快速染色。结果:2例(4%)TBLA患者无坏死,53例(96%)TBLA患者坏死。PCR检测细针淋巴结抽吸标本中结核分枝杆菌复合体阳性17例(30%),阴性38例(70%)。结论:PCR与FNAC的敏感性无显著差异(p值= 0.33)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Updated Review on Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA): Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and the Current Approaches for Its Treatment Molecular Pathogenesis and Treatment Strategies of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) Epilepsy Classification (ILAE Classification 2017) in Resource-limited Countries: A Cross-sectional Study on Epilepsy in Pediatric Patients from Sudan Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension With Transcribriform Plate Intranasal Meningocele Without Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea: A Case Report Perception, Practice, and Attitude Toward Prostate-specific Antigen Test Among Sudanese Urologists
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1