Social Movements for Democracy in Post-Communist space: two Revolutions in Czechoslovakia (1968, 1989)

Olena Babinova
{"title":"Social Movements for Democracy in Post-Communist space: two Revolutions in Czechoslovakia (1968, 1989)","authors":"Olena Babinova","doi":"10.22364/hssl.29.2.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is a comparative analysis of two revolutions in Czechoslovakia in 1968 and 1989. The main question of this article is: Why did the revolution in 1968 fail, but the revolution in 1989 succeed? In this article the main reasons, common features and differences of those two revolutions were analysed and defined. The main conclusion of this article is the fact that a necessary condition for the victory of popular resistance is the support of these manifestations by the military or their non-interference. The 1968 revolution was suppressed as a result of the invasion of the Warsaw Pact troops under the leadership of the Soviet Union, but the events of 1989 were marked by a decision by the country’s military leadership on their neutrality.","PeriodicalId":143122,"journal":{"name":"Humanities and Social Sciences: Latvia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Humanities and Social Sciences: Latvia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22364/hssl.29.2.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article is a comparative analysis of two revolutions in Czechoslovakia in 1968 and 1989. The main question of this article is: Why did the revolution in 1968 fail, but the revolution in 1989 succeed? In this article the main reasons, common features and differences of those two revolutions were analysed and defined. The main conclusion of this article is the fact that a necessary condition for the victory of popular resistance is the support of these manifestations by the military or their non-interference. The 1968 revolution was suppressed as a result of the invasion of the Warsaw Pact troops under the leadership of the Soviet Union, but the events of 1989 were marked by a decision by the country’s military leadership on their neutrality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
后共产主义空间中的民主社会运动:捷克斯洛伐克的两次革命(1968年、1989年)
本文是对1968年和1989年捷克斯洛伐克两次革命的比较分析。本文的主要问题是:为什么1968年的革命失败了,而1989年的革命成功了?本文分析和界定了这两次革命的主要原因、共同特点和差异。本文的主要结论是这样一个事实,即人民抵抗胜利的一个必要条件是军队对这些表现的支持或不干涉。1968年的革命由于苏联领导下的华约军队入侵而被镇压,但1989年的事件标志着该国军事领导层决定保持中立。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Latvian-Brazilian Economic Relations 1918–1940 The Strategic Importance of Entrepreneurship as a mechanism for Sustainable Economic Growth in Nigeria Social Movements for Democracy in Post-Communist space: two Revolutions in Czechoslovakia (1968, 1989) Knowledge Intensive Business Sector in Latvian National Economy: Random Effect Factor outlook Ethnic Politics and Electoral Violence in Nigeria: A Study of the South-South Geopolitical Zone
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1