"Tax-Free": The Effect of a Heuristic Cue on the Choice Between a TFSA and an RRSP

L. Berger, Jonathan Farrar, Ruth Pogacar, Lu Y. Zhang
{"title":"\"Tax-Free\": The Effect of a Heuristic Cue on the Choice Between a TFSA and an RRSP","authors":"L. Berger, Jonathan Farrar, Ruth Pogacar, Lu Y. Zhang","doi":"10.32721/ctj.2023.71.1.berger","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors investigate whether and, if so, the extent to which a heuristic cue, the term \"tax-free,\" contained in the name of one of the two primary tax-sheltered savings plans in Canada—the tax-free savings account (TFSA)—biases individuals' saving preferences relative to the registered retirement savings plan. On the basis of the heuristic-systematic model of information processing, the authors predict that the term \"tax-free\" is a favourable heuristic cue that will suppress systematic processing and bias individuals toward selecting a savings plan with this term in its name. They conduct three experiments to test this proposition. Overall, the results suggest that individuals have a clear preference for a tax-sheltered savings plan with \"tax-free\" in its name—regardless of the content of accompanying explanatory information. The preference for savings plans with \"tax-free\" in the name may suggest the need for more education and financial advice to reduce the use of heuristics.","PeriodicalId":375948,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Tax Journal/Revue fiscale canadienne","volume":"1931 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Tax Journal/Revue fiscale canadienne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32721/ctj.2023.71.1.berger","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The authors investigate whether and, if so, the extent to which a heuristic cue, the term "tax-free," contained in the name of one of the two primary tax-sheltered savings plans in Canada—the tax-free savings account (TFSA)—biases individuals' saving preferences relative to the registered retirement savings plan. On the basis of the heuristic-systematic model of information processing, the authors predict that the term "tax-free" is a favourable heuristic cue that will suppress systematic processing and bias individuals toward selecting a savings plan with this term in its name. They conduct three experiments to test this proposition. Overall, the results suggest that individuals have a clear preference for a tax-sheltered savings plan with "tax-free" in its name—regardless of the content of accompanying explanatory information. The preference for savings plans with "tax-free" in the name may suggest the need for more education and financial advice to reduce the use of heuristics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“免税”:启发式提示对TFSA和RRSP选择的影响
作者调查了启发式提示,即加拿大两种主要避税储蓄计划之一的免税储蓄账户(tax-free savings account, TFSA)的名称中包含的“免税”一词,与注册退休储蓄计划相比,是否会对个人的储蓄偏好产生偏差,如果是的话,在多大程度上也是如此。在信息处理的启发式-系统模型的基础上,作者预测“免税”一词是一个有利的启发式线索,它会抑制系统处理,并使个人倾向于选择以该术语命名的储蓄计划。他们进行了三个实验来验证这个命题。总体而言,研究结果表明,无论附带的解释信息的内容如何,个人都明显倾向于以“免税”为名称的避税储蓄计划。对名称中带有“免税”字样的储蓄计划的偏好,可能表明需要更多的教育和财务建议,以减少启发式的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
False Statement or Omission Penalties in Canadian Tax Law Policy Forum: Some Reflections on Ethical Considerations in Tax Litigation Canadian Tax Foundation Awards/Prix de la Fondation canadienne de fiscalité Finances of the Nation: Survey of Provincial and Territorial Budgets, 2023-24 Policy Forum: Editors' Introduction—Ethics and Taxation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1