Intersubjectivity and mental health nurses as insider researchers

P. Archard, Isobel Moore, Michael Lewis, M. O’Reilly
{"title":"Intersubjectivity and mental health nurses as insider researchers","authors":"P. Archard, Isobel Moore, Michael Lewis, M. O’Reilly","doi":"10.12968/bjmh.2022.0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ayres et al's (2021) reflective account published in this journal discusses Ayres' experience of undertaking a doctoral study concerned with how mental health nurses who had been assaulted by patients in secure settings make sense of this experience. This commentary recognises the importance of extending the dialogue initiated by Ayres' account, specifically regarding intersubjectivity in research relationships and research beneficence. An emphasis is placed on how practitioner participation in research interviews, whether as the interviewer or interviewee, can be a cathartic experience and foster practice reflection. However, engagement in more sensitive research may also present additional risk considerations for the insider researcher, such as emotional safety risks.","PeriodicalId":149493,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Mental Health Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Mental Health Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/bjmh.2022.0025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ayres et al's (2021) reflective account published in this journal discusses Ayres' experience of undertaking a doctoral study concerned with how mental health nurses who had been assaulted by patients in secure settings make sense of this experience. This commentary recognises the importance of extending the dialogue initiated by Ayres' account, specifically regarding intersubjectivity in research relationships and research beneficence. An emphasis is placed on how practitioner participation in research interviews, whether as the interviewer or interviewee, can be a cathartic experience and foster practice reflection. However, engagement in more sensitive research may also present additional risk considerations for the insider researcher, such as emotional safety risks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
主体间性与心理健康护士作为内部研究者
Ayres等人(2021)在本杂志上发表的反思报告讨论了Ayres进行博士研究的经历,该研究涉及在安全环境中被患者袭击的精神卫生护士如何理解这种经历。这篇评论认识到扩展艾尔斯的叙述所发起的对话的重要性,特别是关于研究关系和研究利益的主体间性。重点放在实践者如何参与研究访谈,无论是作为采访者还是被采访者,可以是一个宣泄经验和促进实践反思。然而,参与更敏感的研究可能也会给内部研究人员带来额外的风险考虑,比如情绪安全风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How carers' needs can be met by staff within inpatient settings: a qualitative study Move to improve physical and mental health Community rehabilitation for people with severe and enduring mental health difficulties: a description and evaluation of a new community enhanced rehabilitation team Misuse of the Mental Capacity Act: ‘you have capacity to end your life and there is nothing we can do about it’ The experiences, views and beliefs of emerging adults and their carers of receiving adult mental health services in the UK: a systematic review and meta-ethnography
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1