A Critical Take on the Policy Recommendations of the EU High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence

Michael Veale
{"title":"A Critical Take on the Policy Recommendations of the EU High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence","authors":"Michael Veale","doi":"10.31228/osf.io/dvx4f","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The European Commission recently published the policy recommendations of its “High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence”: a heavily anticipated document, particularly in the context of the stated ambition of the new Commission President to regulate in that area. This article argues that these recommendations have significant deficits in a range of areas. It analyses a selection of the Group’s proposals in context of the governance of artificial intelligence more broadly, focusing on issues of framing, representation and expertise, and on the lack of acknowledgement of key issues of power and infrastructure underpinning modern information economies and practices of optimisation.","PeriodicalId":128369,"journal":{"name":"CompSciRN: Other Cybersecurity","volume":"95 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"38","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CompSciRN: Other Cybersecurity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31228/osf.io/dvx4f","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38

Abstract

The European Commission recently published the policy recommendations of its “High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence”: a heavily anticipated document, particularly in the context of the stated ambition of the new Commission President to regulate in that area. This article argues that these recommendations have significant deficits in a range of areas. It analyses a selection of the Group’s proposals in context of the governance of artificial intelligence more broadly, focusing on issues of framing, representation and expertise, and on the lack of acknowledgement of key issues of power and infrastructure underpinning modern information economies and practices of optimisation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对欧盟人工智能高级别专家组政策建议的批判性看法
欧盟委员会最近公布了其“人工智能高级别专家组”的政策建议:这是一份备受期待的文件,特别是在新任委员会主席明确表示要在该领域进行监管的背景下。本文认为,这些建议在一系列领域存在重大缺陷。它在更广泛的人工智能治理背景下分析了该集团的一些建议,重点关注框架、代表性和专业知识的问题,以及对支持现代信息经济和优化实践的权力和基础设施的关键问题缺乏认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Blockchain Technology and Intellectual Property – A Basic Introduction Endogenous Data Collection in Platform Markets: Privacy and Welfare Beyond Bitcoin: The Economics of Cryptocurrencies and Blockchain Technologies (Chapter 6: Smart Contracts and Blockchain) Privacy by Default, Abuse by Design: EU Competition Concerns About Apple's New App Tracking Policy Cryptocurrency & Its Impact on Environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1