Does Section 191 of the Corporations Act Include Conflicting Duties?

R. Langford, I. Ramsay
{"title":"Does Section 191 of the Corporations Act Include Conflicting Duties?","authors":"R. Langford, I. Ramsay","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3350837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An important issue is whether s 191 of the Australian Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – which requires directors to disclose material personal interests – includes conflicting duties. In other words, where a director faces a conflict between duties to different entities or persons (rather than a conflict of interest) is the director obliged to disclose this in accordance with s 191? This issue has not been the subject of detailed research and has not been resolved. In this research note the authors argue that conflicting duties do need to be disclosed under s 191. This is for three reasons. First, a close review of the Parliamentary materials surrounding s 191 indicates no intention to exclude conflicting duties from the disclosure requirements. Second, there is evidence that those involved in reform of the statutory disclosure provisions were of the view that conflicts of interest include conflicting duties and therefore there was no need to explicitly mention conflicting duties in the statutory provisions dealing with disclosure of interests. Third, in policy terms, conflicting duties have the potential to inhibit a director’s exercise of their duties and powers in good faith in the interests of the company and therefore should be disclosed under s 191.","PeriodicalId":376950,"journal":{"name":"Fiduciary Law eJournal","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fiduciary Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3350837","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An important issue is whether s 191 of the Australian Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – which requires directors to disclose material personal interests – includes conflicting duties. In other words, where a director faces a conflict between duties to different entities or persons (rather than a conflict of interest) is the director obliged to disclose this in accordance with s 191? This issue has not been the subject of detailed research and has not been resolved. In this research note the authors argue that conflicting duties do need to be disclosed under s 191. This is for three reasons. First, a close review of the Parliamentary materials surrounding s 191 indicates no intention to exclude conflicting duties from the disclosure requirements. Second, there is evidence that those involved in reform of the statutory disclosure provisions were of the view that conflicts of interest include conflicting duties and therefore there was no need to explicitly mention conflicting duties in the statutory provisions dealing with disclosure of interests. Third, in policy terms, conflicting duties have the potential to inhibit a director’s exercise of their duties and powers in good faith in the interests of the company and therefore should be disclosed under s 191.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《公司法》第191条是否包括相互冲突的责任?
一个重要的问题是,要求董事披露重大个人利益的《2001年澳大利亚公司法》(Cth)第191条是否包括相互冲突的责任。换句话说,如果董事面对不同实体或个人的职责冲突(而不是利益冲突),董事是否有义务根据第191条披露这一点?这个问题还没有得到详细的研究,也没有得到解决。在本研究报告中,作者认为,根据第191条,确实需要披露相互冲突的职责。这有三个原因。首先,仔细研究国会有关第191条的资料可以发现,政府并没有打算将相互冲突的职责排除在公开要求之外。其次,有证据表明,参与法定披露条款改革的人士认为,利益冲突包括义务冲突,因此在涉及利益披露的法定条款中没有必要明确提及义务冲突。第三,就政策而言,相互冲突的职责有可能阻碍董事出于公司利益善意行使其职责和权力,因此应根据第191条予以披露。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Directors' Duties: Section 172 of the UK Companies Act Value Preservation Increasingly Acknowledged as Primary Purpose and Fiduciary Duty What Would Settlor Do? Immortal Trust Settlors, Federal Transfer Taxes, and the Protean Irrevocable Trust The Pluralist Foundations of Corporate Law and Governance A General Defense of Information Fiduciaries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1